BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Each literary genre has its own stylistic features. Knowing the style of theses literary genres will lead to a better understanding of them. The current research has tried to study the stylistic features of Amir Moazi, s poems, especially the praiseworthy poems in his divan linguistically and intellectually. The source used in this research was his collection of poems edited by Abbas Igbal. METHODOLOGY: this research was conducted by descriptive-analytical method and data collection tool is library. FINDINGS: Moezi, s poetic language is a simple, fluent and eloquent language. Moezi utters many meanings in simple and understandable words and his strong nature in making expressions easy and unambiguous has long been considered by critics. However, most poets rightly believe that his poetry is not at a high level in terms of illustration and in fact it is a repetition of past poets, images. CONCLUSION: Moezi, s poetry has significant linguistic and historical values. Many Persian words in various morphological constructions were collected in his divan. However, many irrelevant Arabic words are also found in his speech, mostly for rhyming purposes. In the field of expressive techniques, the main rhetorical feature in his poetry is simile. However, the verbal features that lead to musical features more than the spiritual adornments. The main format of his poems is the ode/ laudatory poem which is relatively shorter than praise poems by other poets. Intellectually, the predominant element of his poetry is praise and moral and educational themes are very few in his poetry. Moezi also has a number of lyric poems, pieces, compositions, prepositions and quatrains among his poems in addition to his ode poems.

Amir Moezzi’s, the famous poet of Seljuqi period, Divan has been published twice. The first edition was published by Eslamie Bookstore from Abbas Ashtiani in Tehran in 1318 (A.H). This edition contained 18623 couplets. The second edition was published by Mar2 Ban Publication from Naser Hayyeri. This edition is somehow disordered. Apparently this edition is from the printed copy of Eghbal's revision and there is no reference to the date of writing. Therefore, in order to make a comparison for revision of a new edition, the erroneous copy of Hayyeri is put aside and a new comparison is made between Eghbal's revision with new ones.

Rudaki is the first great poet in the Persian Literature. He is known to compose so many poems. He is also considered to be one of the earliest poets among Persian poets. Variety of concepts, Power of speech, coherence, delicacy and tenacity in his verses caused a large number of poets to turn their attention to his works. Many poets have quoted some of his verses in their poems. The earliest trace in which you can find Rudaki's quotations is in Farokhi Sistani’s and Amir Moezi Neyshabouro’s Divan. In this article, I have tried to study the attitudes of Moezi towards Rudaki, quotation of the verses, and some of the common motives between Rudaki's verses and Moezi’s.

Among different languages of the words, Arabic language and literature has the greatest impact on the Persian literature. After entrance of Islam to Iran, Arabic words gradually entered to Persian language. At first, this process was mutual and both languages lent words to each other and borrowed from each other. Over the time, this process changed and many idioms, compounds, concepts and poetic meanings entered to Persian literature. Ibn Motaz Abbasi is the famous poet of the middle third century and very influential in the field of describing. This poet was very good at simile and composed poetry in ten components of Boasting Poem, Ghazal, Panegyric verse, Motebat, Rejections, Description, Anacreontic Verse, Death-Elegy, asceticism and Syllable. Amir Moezi Neyshaboori the famous poet of the fifteen century was completely familiar with the poetry of Ibn Motaz. He has used many concepts and similes of Ibn Motaz in his poetry. This research by using a comparative approach has tried to study the common concepts in the poetry of Amir Moezi and Ibn Motaz.

As one of the most powerful kings of the Seljuk Empire, Malik-Shah had many victorious wars over his twenty-year reign. These wars and victories are among the topics that were noticed by Amir Moezzi, the poet of Malik-Shah's court. Through a descriptive-analytical approach, this study examines the reflection of Malik-Shah's wars in Amir Moezzi's Odes and answers the following questions: 1. How are Malik-Shah's wars reflected in Moezzi's Odes? 2. Which details does Moezzi discuss when describing Malik Shah’s wars? The results show that Malik-Shah's wars are reflected in Moezzi's Odes in two ways: a) Praise Odes, in which Malik-Shah's wars and bravery are mentioned, and b) Odes composed to congratulate Malik-Shah's victory in wars. Some details of Malik-Shah's wars reflected in Moezzi's Odes are as follows: Malik-Shah's bravery and hostility, his successive victories and the expansion of the Seljuk Emperor's territory due to these victories. By addressing such details, Moezzi tries to describe the bravery of Malik-Shah and his troops in the war against enemies and opponents, his policy of prioritizing military power, and his strategies for confronting enemies.

Amir Moezzi is one of the famous poets of Khorasan who had honored Arabic literature as well. That’s why he has used Arabs’ contents and words in his poetry, directly or indirectly.The present article tries to survey two poems and some verses of Amir Moezzi and the influence of Emro’-al-Qeis on his poetry.

Generally, versified historiography or recording historical events has had a special place in Arabic and Persian poetry. But this has been widely and differently emerged in Arabic literature in Abbasside era. Iranian poets of this era had been greatly influenced by eminent Arab poets and litterateurs in recording historical events, as they had made a close relationship with Arabic literature and poetry. In this respect, the historical panegyrics of Amir Moezi as a court poet influenced by Arab poets like Mutanabbi in his use of words, poetic images, and themes could be compared from different aspects with the historical panegyrics of Ibn Hani who has been also influenced by Mutanabbi and is called the “ Mutanabbi of the west” . He has-directly and consciously-adopted many of the themes in his panegyrics from Arabic poems, through the study and mastery of the poems of some contemporary or earlier Arab poets-or indirectly and unconsciously-through the influence of some contemporary or earlier Iranian poets. And he had observed the overall design, general structure, themes, and poetic images of Arabic odes in a number of his odes. So, in this research, by comparing and examining the historical praises of these two poets and expressing their similarities and differences in terms of theme, structure, and poetic images, the position of each of them in recording the historical events of their eras was shown.