The current research was conducted with the aim of understanding the lived experiences of student-teachers of the implemented curriculum of the primary education field in Teacher Training University. The qualitative research approach and the descriptive phenomenological research method were based on Husserl's theory, the participants of the research were students and teachers in the field of elementary education at Teacher Training University of Arak, (Iran) which was conducted using a purposeful sampling approach and using a semi-structured interview with 65 students of elementary education at Teacher Training University of Arak. The data analysis was conducted through a descriptive method based on the Claysey approach, which was implemented using Max Kyoda 12 software. The findings of the research indicated that in the coding process, 4 main categories (reduced by the researcher), 22 sub-categories (reduced) and 55 open categories (suspended) were identified. The lived experiences of the student-teachers were similar in the main and secondary codes, but different in the open codes. The main codes included: acquiring ability in the field of teaching method, using information and communication technology, developing cognitive ability, helping students solve learning problems. According to the results of the research, it was observed that the experiences gained by student teachers overlapped with the topics of the elementary education curriculum, which indicated alignment with the intended goals of the elementary education curriculum of Teacher Training University.

In the case of the initial endowment for the fetus, the Civil Code does not have an explicit provision and has generally limited itself to determining the ruling on the issue of a non-existent endowment based on the existing one. A large group of Shiite and Sunni jurists believe the initial endowment for the fetus is invalid and have cited reasons such as the fetus's non-existence, the fetus's lack of ownership, qualification, and the consensus of jurists in this field. On the other hand, another group by taking an opposing position such as having the right of ownership for fetus absolutely, the ownership of the endowment contract and claiming the absence of consensus of jurists in this field have insisted on the replacing the acceptance of a guardian (Vali) or ruler for the fetus and claiming that there is no consensus. The present article has been done by descriptive –analytical and inferential methods and by collecting data in a library, examines both perspectives, analyze and evaluate their reasons and overall prefer the opinion of the first group that is well-known and based on stronger evidence opinion.