The Initial Endowment for the Fetus

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Karimi Nasrin; Ahmadi Fatemeh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: FAMILY LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE JOURNAL Year:2025 | Volume:30 | Issue:83 Page(s): 193-216

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Initial Endowment for the Fetus

Author(s)

Karimi Nasrin | Ahmadi Fatemeh | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Legal capacity (competence/eligibility)

fetus

civil rights

Pregnancy

Beneficiary (of a waqf/endowment)

Endower/Founder (of a waqf/endowment)

Abstract

In the case of the initial endowment for the fetus, the Civil Code does not have an explicit provision and has generally limited itself to determining the ruling on the issue of a non-existent endowment based on the existing one. A large group of Shiite and Sunni jurists believe the initial endowment for the fetus is invalid and have cited reasons such as the fetus's non-existence, the fetus's lack of ownership, qualification, and the consensus of jurists in this field. On the other hand, another group by taking an opposing position such as having the right of ownership for fetus absolutely, the ownership of the endowment contract and claiming the absence of consensus of jurists in this field have insisted on the replacing the acceptance of a guardian (Vali) or ruler for the fetus and claiming that there is no consensus. The present article has been done by descriptive –analytical and inferential methods and by collecting data in a library, examines both perspectives, analyze and evaluate their reasons and overall prefer the opinion of the first group that is well-known and based on stronger evidence opinion.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans