EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL MEDICINE EXPERT VIEW POINTS UPON PENAL FILES IN TEHRAN ADMINISTRATION OF JUDICIARY BETWEEN 1997 AND 2000

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HASHEMI R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Forensic Medicine Year:2002 | Volume:8 | Issue:27 Page(s): 12-15

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

8,105

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL MEDICINE EXPERT VIEW POINTS UPON PENAL FILES IN TEHRAN ADMINISTRATION OF JUDICIARY BETWEEN 1997 AND 2000

Author(s)

HASHEMI R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SPECIALISTQ4

JUDGEQ4

LEGAL MEDICINEQ2

Abstract

Background: In this study we evaluated the level of effectiveness of expert viewpoints in judiciary system.Methods: A total of 650 files were reviewed in 4 courts in Tehran.Results: Of all of the files, expert viewpoints did not accepted completely in 62 cases (9.8%) and completely accepted in 386 cases (60.9%). In 58 cases (9.1%) the viewpoints accepted partially and in 102 cases (16.1%), there was not any request from LEGAL MEDICINE organization. In sexual crimes this was more usual. The JUDGEs determined the fine personally in 36 cases (5.7%) and had some fault in determination of the fines in 47 cases (7.4%).Conclusion: This study shows that different JUDGEs don't use LEGAL MEDICINE expert viewpoints in a similar way. It seems that usage of expert viewpoints in special tasks is mandatory and the JUDGEs should request expert viewpoints.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HASHEMI, R.. (2002). EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL MEDICINE EXPERT VIEW POINTS UPON PENAL FILES IN TEHRAN ADMINISTRATION OF JUDICIARY BETWEEN 1997 AND 2000. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE, 8(27), 12-15. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/53521/en

Vancouver: Copy

HASHEMI R.. EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL MEDICINE EXPERT VIEW POINTS UPON PENAL FILES IN TEHRAN ADMINISTRATION OF JUDICIARY BETWEEN 1997 AND 2000. SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE[Internet]. 2002;8(27):12-15. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/53521/en

IEEE: Copy

R. HASHEMI, “EVALUATION OF THE LEVEL OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL MEDICINE EXPERT VIEW POINTS UPON PENAL FILES IN TEHRAN ADMINISTRATION OF JUDICIARY BETWEEN 1997 AND 2000,” SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF FORENSIC MEDICINE, vol. 8, no. 27, pp. 12–15, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/53521/en

Related Journal Papers