In the present era, one of the reasons for the family crisis is the non-systemic view of the family and the principles that govern it. The purpose of this study is to investigate the capacity of the principles governing the family in resolving family conflicts. so, after enumerating the principles governing the family and examining the place of these principles in organizing the monotheistic legislative system, the indicators expressing the rights arising from these principles and the effects of violating these principles and the rights arising from them were extracted. Then, by reviewing previous researches, family injuries and effective causes of these injuries were extracted. Finally, the indicators derived from the principles and effective causes of family injuries were compared and analyzed. In this study, the qualitative method has been used in a descriptive-analytical manner. The method of collecting information has been in the form of documents and libraries. Research data were also processed using qualitative content analysis technique. The results of the research indicate that most of the causes of family disputes with the effects of violation of principles have a common semantic space and in fact are in conflict with the rights of principles. Therefore, the causes of family problems are also in conflict with the principles. Hence, the violation of the principles governing the family has caused many family problems. Therefore, it is suggested that authorities provide the ground for the implementation of these principles in the family through policy-making, codification of laws and culture-building.

With respect to the date of the Tavvabin movement, there have been several different and conflicting speeches mentioned in the primary sources of Islamic history. In total there are seven different dates mentioned and in unique refrence we find conflicting dates related to Tavvabin history events. Comparison of the dates mentioned in ancient references and the use of historic witnesses and the Tavvabin route map have helped the author of this paper to compute the distance traveled by the Tavvabin and comparing this distance with routes of similar wars to finally reach the conclusion that the battle has taken place in Jamadi-al-avval of the year 65 in the time of Marvan government and therefore all the other mentioned dates are not valid.

The issue of indicators for resolving administrative disputes such as compromise, mediation, arbitration and other forms of social justice is one of the most prominent government actions in public service missions. This research is aimed at studying the necessity of non-trafficking practices in contemporary legal systems, which is likely to be seen in the practice of any government. The method of research, based on the purpose, is considered to be a practical application and has been subjected to a non-experimental descriptive method in terms of the nature and method of collecting the data and data. Based on the findings of the research, it was found that these practices all have common traits that are distinguished from the formal justice structure. . The trends in these practices are much simpler and more informal than judicial procedures And in most cases, the proceedings are essentially flexible, without official formalities and without extensive rules of procedure. In the Iranian administrative law system, the institutionalization of these practices has been proposed alongside the judicial authority, especially with the administration of the state's "administrative contracts", in order to reduce the number of judicial cases and the continuous improvement of public services.

The Gettier problem is a set of counter examples that challenges the standard definition of knowledge within epistemology before the second half of the 20th century. According to the standard definition, which we call JTB, knowledge is nothing more than a justified true believing. The problem, roughly, is that the standard definition does not include the necessary and sufficient conditions of knowledge, since there might be some counter examples that are not cases of knowledge, even if they are cases of justified true believing. Since then epistemologists have gone to a lot of trouble to avoid, or resolve, or even to deny, the Gettier problem. One of the main efforts to resolve the problem has been done by a theory called externalism which has two main forms: causal theory and reliabilism. Reliabilism considers the concept or the condition of justification as the main source of the Gettier problem and tries to replace it, accordingly, with a second and different one, i. e. a reliable process. This concept or condition is focused on the role of an external process that creates mostly the true beliefs in a person. This article argues that the externalist- reliabilist proposal is not capable of resolving the Gettier problem.

Social networks have shaped a major part of our lives today. In addition to benefits for societies, this phenomenon has also brought disadvantages. One of these important problems is breach of users' privacy in social networks. Social networks have access to the data and information of many of their users, who can use that information for different purposes. Therefore, it is necessary to protect the information and privacy of the users more than before. The main question is whether collecting, categorizing and selling users' information in social networks is a breach of their privacy? And what solutions are there to deal with it? In this article, using the analytical descriptive research method, the above issue has been investigated. Finally, this article has reached the conclusion that the use of users' information by social networks is a breach of users' privacy, and it is not possible to accept all conditions when users register in social networks as the user's consent to use their data. Therefore, it is necessary to regulate the use of user information in social networks and prevent further misuse of user information. In this regard, there are three main solutions (regulation, self-regulation and tax collection). It is not effective to use only one method to protect users' data. it is recommended to use a combination of the aforementioned methods, but the most effective method in this regard is to impose a tax on social networks and spend these amounts to develop digital security and protect users' data and compensation for damages. In Iran, due to the existence of a legal gap, in order to protect users' data, a law should be approved to protect users and their information in social networks.

Lyotard, influenced by Wittgenstein and language games asserts the primacy of "diversity and difference" in But, society Habermas seek "consensus" and therefore domains an organic whole society and one that is looking at Structuralist view Saussure' s language. Wittgenstein in "functional theory of meaning" interprets the language in which, speaking of "life forms or forms of the game" and "event locations" is present. Thus, he can no longer look from the perspective of holistic, rational and systematic in there. In contrast, Habermas Looks holistic, as Wittgenstein and Lyotard rejected language as well as rational and holistic look at the language of the cast. In this article, is it attempted to criticize to the radical view of Lyotard and his interpretation of language games and then to criticize Habermas, with adjustments in the views of these two philosophers, conflict the solve between them. In this way, the use of mediation CM-theory agonism- and philosopher Charles Taylor -idea multiculturalism-as two other Wittgenstein an or at least very impressed by her, are responsible for the reconciliation between the of views the Lyotard and Habermas. The main question is what the is between relation the is Wittgenstein and Anti-Wittgensteinian thought of language? The main claim is that is not ratio the accompanied.