The collective life of individuals has always been intertwined with a concept known as power, which has been reflected in the governance of states over the past few centuries. In recent decades, manifestations of governance have gradually diversified, and alongside states, multinational corporations and platforms (internet platforms) are also considered sources of power. Studying the legal dimensions of power and how it is established and regulated is a hallmark of the field of constitutional law. Previously, due to the close relationship between power and the concept of the state, constitutionalism was also viewed as a state-centered ideology. However, the necessity of redefining power and separating it from its modern origin (the state) has led classical constitutionalism to recognize new power holders in constitutional law – in our discussion, digital actors – and to equip itself with a responsive discourse in this regard. In this discourse, state-centrism must give way to community-oriented perspectives, and numerous normative documents should regulate alongside constitutional laws. Community-oriented constitutionalism views society as composed of systems such as economy, politics, technology, and law, each of which, despite having its own rules and domains, is inevitably connected to its surrounding environment. This research aims to discuss the relationship between constitutional law and the digital realm and to answer the question of how digital actors can be incorporated into this process while maintaining the core of constitutionalism. The main finding is the introduction of the concept of community-oriented constitutionalism as a theoretical basis compatible with the governance of digital actors, from which a new domain called digital constitutionalism emerges.