Determining foreign policies and strategies requires attention to the perimeter environment and future changes. Iraq, as a country with a geopolitical position whose transformations can affect the region's situation, has a mixed population of different ethnics and religions. Sunni ARABS constitute 20% of the Iraqi population and for the historical role and history of the rule of the majority of Shiites, are of great importance in the knowing the future. In this descriptive-analytic study, considering the complexity and uncertainty in the scene of Iraq's developments, the scenario planning method have been used and data collected from meeting of experts on contentious practices mind, and analyzed with deductive approach with G. B. N pattern. And finally, two main uncertainties include: Sunni countries accepting or confrontation with Iraq's and the integration or segregation of parties, events and characters Iraq's Shiite, identified and four alternative scenarios had been and described. 1. Partnership and Cooperation; 2. Selfish Accompaniment; 3. Hopefully Demand and 4. Confrontation and Nationalism and strategies for realizing Iran's favorable scenario was reported.

During the twentieth century of A.C. Khouzestan the most strategic province if Iran, more than any other provinces of this country, has been exposed to separatism. Arab governments, Specially Iraq, have been the greatest planner and obstinate spporter of separation of this part of Iran. Being ARABS and particularly historical desire of the magority of this province inhabitance for separation has been the most important excuse and proof supporting this plan. This research tries to analysis the divergence and convergence degree of Khouzestan ARABS with regard to the major constructing political core of country an national aspiration as well. 

ARABS’ silence regarding normalization of ties with the Zionist adversary could be a provocative for many individuals as the rulers of some Arab countries who hastily proceeded to normalization represent neither their own people nor even some other Arab rulers. This research addresses the origin of issue of Palestine, the inception of the idea of forming a state for Jews in holding the first Zionist conference which was the opening meeting of Zionists on August 29, 1897 in Swiss Basel by the initiative of Theodor Herzl, how Herzl promoted the idea of founding a state for Jewish people in Palestine and initiated an immigration of Jews to the Palestinian territory followed by Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 and forming a state for the Jewish people with the approval of the British government. In 20s and 30s, Arab countries who were seeking independence could not stop the Balfour Declaration by the British government as the ruler of the Palestine territories under a mandate. The British granted what it didn’ t possess to those who didn’ t deserve it. Arab countries were then after forming small states for their tribes or families free of influence of any strategic thought in the Arabic unity that could impose its decisions. WWII further provoked divisions and rifts among such countries. French and English rulers of such countries as well as their Italian counterparts in countries like Libya were replaced with a fresh batch of rulers from US or USSR to directly act as their proxies or their representatives. Later, these rulers went on to plant what late Imam Khomeini (may God bless his soul) a cancerous tumor in the region to be leveraged, in time of need and wish, as their military arm to punish who dare to step out of the US prescribed lines. In 70s and 80s, following the Suez Canal war and the exclusion of Britain and France from world equations, Arab countries faced a duopoly of US-USSR. Even consecutive wars such as 1948 war (Nakba ), 1967 war (Naksa ) and Ramadan War of 1973 during which Syrian and Egyptian armies achieved heroic feats could not bring Arab unity. As a consequence of the last war, Egypt and Syria drifted apart when the latter remained steadfast on its belief while the former chose compromise. ARABS focused on the issue of Palestine from the very issue of “ Balfour Declaration” in 1917 with individual and collective movements to support the Palestinian nation. Hundreds of Arab youths voluntarily joined the Palestine Arab revolution in 1936 with the help of some Arab countries. This revolution marked the start of the importance of issue of Palestine for all ARABS. However, some then Arab rulers submitted to the humiliation of British pressures and stopped their revolutionary youths from their movements and struggles. They resorted to negotiations with the British and led the foundation for dividing Palestine territory between a Jewish state and a Palestinian state through “ Bale” Committee which was a British design. In contrast, the Zionist scheme was reliant on immigration of Jews, development of settlements and maximum expansion using their great force to occupy lands, bringing their enemies to their knees as well as the strategy of aggression and war. The vast influx of Jews to Palestine led to expulsion, forced immigration and displacement of Palestinians. Those who remained behind faced armed Zionist mobs. Upon the British announcement of terminating its mandate over Palestine and forming the occupying state of Israel in Palestinian territories on May 15, 1948, Arab states convened an Arab League meeting to adopt decisive decisions to counter Israel’ s rebellious behaviors. Such decision include complete boycott of Israel in all fields, conclusion of Arab Joint Defense Agreement and economic cooperation among all Arab countries in April 1950 in response to developments and the evolving situation of Palestine. Later, the June 5, 1967 disaster unfolded to further aggravate the pain and sufferings of ARABS inflicted by Zionist occupation. Israel’ s direct hostility was not just limited to Palestinian people. It expanded to some other Arab countries with Egypt, Syria, Jordan and Lebanon at the brunt of such attacks. The research pursues the issue by looking into movements of Arab countries against the Zionist regime, inception of popular resistance campaigns of Palestinians in Lebanon, the first Intifada or rock intifada in 1987, the second Intifada or Alaqsa intifada in 2000, Egypt-Israel Peace Accords (Camp David Accords) in 1979, victory of the Islamic Revolution in Iran in 1979 led by late Imam Khomeini, Iran’ s open commitment to directly support the Palestine Cause and opening of Palestine diplomatic mission in Tehran that bought a change in the Zionist regime’ s military-security strategy. The paper also addresses the about-face in Arab states’ position towards Israel from “ wiping out Israel from the map” to “ accession of the Zionist regime to Arab League” , Oslo Accords conclusion between PLO and Israel, the Israel– Jordan peace treaty in 1994 (Wadi Araba Treaty), Arab Peace Initiative in Arab Summit in Beirut in 2002, proposal of entering in full peace with Israel on the condition of withdrawal of Israel to pre-June 1967 borders, formation of state of Palestine with Bayt al-Maqdis as the capital, other proposals to recognize the Occupying Regime, encouraging other Arab states to make peace with Israel and normalize their ties with the latter and most recently normalization of ties with the Zionist Regime by some Arab countries including UAE, Bahrain and Sudan as well as their peace and normalization agreements. Armed conflicts of Resistance Forces with the Zionist Regime such as barbaric invasion of south of Lebanon by Israel in 2006 during which Lebanese Resistance forces displayed great courage and authority in fighting the Zionists. Great Middle East and New Middle East projects were tabled through creation of rifts among ARABS, inciting riots and chaos in countries opposing normalization of ties with Israeli regime, creation of an illusory adversary and pointing the compass of hostility to Israel towards Iran. US president Donald Trump proposed the so-called Deal of Century, recognized Bayt al-Maqdis as the capital of Israel and relocated US embassy to this city to commit the biggest transgression upon the ARABS and Palestinians. Contrary to expectations, Arab states remained passive to mark the collapse of ARABS’ position. This was followed by quick steps of certain Arab states to normalize their ties with Israel. Meanwhile, the Arab League withdrew its supports of Palestine Cause due to outbreak of disagreements among its members and loss of independence to countries that dismissed the issue of Palestine was at the center of its agenda. Although the wave of normalizing the ties has been formally announced, nations still keep staging demonstrations and protest rallies to voice their opposition to this idea. In conclusion, the author talks about the opposition of Arab nations to normalization of ties with Israel as their enemy no. 1, their belief that Palestine is still their first priority, that Resistance Movements should always oppose normalization and the fact that years after conclusion of peace accords between Egypt and Jordan, the peoples in such countries still oppose any normalization with an aggressor. The author also talks about other actors in Palestine in Resistance Axis. He acknowledges that Resistance forces have both the ability and rich experience to counter the normalization trend as they don’ t share the strategic interests of countries that normalized their ties with the Occupying regime and the fact that such forces are really concerned about increased dominance of Israel over regional Arab countries. Conclusion: What we need today is not condemning those countries who signed normalization agreements with the Zionist regime as “ wounding a dead body does not hurt” . These countries have shown their true colors. Instead, what is desirable is strengthening forces who oppose this Israeli-US scheme as the supporters of such forces. This support does not have to be in a military sense. It rather should take the form of idea of resistance and developing an integrated vision of the Resistance, albeit with differences in tactical implementation methodologies. Furthermore, the resistance should be involved in every sphere in which the Zionist regime has infiltrated through splashy projects to inject its poison such as education, media, economy, investment project or any other undertaking that could openly compromise the integrity of the society. The author asks this question as his closing remarks: the question is not which Arab states are with Palestine. Rather, who Palestine is with?

Media imperialism at the service of the western cultural nato with the purpose of disturbance against the oppressed Islam and of course with reference to the events such as destruction, annihilation and extincting cultural works, libraries and the manifestation of countries civilization and the conquered nations by the omar ebn alkhatab armies makes it due to the honored Islam and Koran and in the cultural atmosphere of the world. It was inspired Islam as the religion of burning the books and counter civilization and what is burned in military expedition and aggression at the time of Caliphs to the seized (usurped) lands was in fact Koran and the Prophet's tradition but not the scientific books of the other nations and the burning was in the fire of ignorance and injudiciousness of usurpers holding the position of divine cliphate.On the other hand, the existing supported documents suggestive oftens of huge libraries in Iran and Alexandria at the time of the Iraq's attack leading by Omar Ebn Alkhatab in the conquered lands. On the other hand, documents and historical books referring to burning these libraries by the order of Omar Ebn Alkhatab show the existence of burning the books in primary ARABS and despising teaching and writing and the psychological structure of Omar Ebn Alkhatab based on not tolerating every forms of the opposting thought and suppressing to the most in human way sand also …are from the stable and undeniable evidence causing this horrible (terrible) event and great cultural crime. The main reason of accusing the oppressed Islam and honored Koran in the events of burning books in the conquered lands by the Caliphs shows the deep ignorance of the western researchers from the deviating event through reaching the utopia of the Prophet and causing an end to the Koran's plan in making the ideal city of shiite world- wide by the Saqife coup.

In this article; the author tries to explore the amount of inclination toward national and ethnic identities among the ARABS of Khuzestan province. Statistical population includes all Arab adults having at least secondary certificate. The main hypothesis is that the Arab ethnic group of Khuzestan inclines towards both national and ethnic identities. There is a meaningful correlation between economic condition and the amount of integration towards national identity of this ethnic group .The more income of the individuals increases; the more they incline towards Iranian-Islamic identity. For inclination towards national identity the components include territorial belonging; belonging to the nation; confidence to the officials and executive apparatus and Farsi language. The ethnic identity has been measured on the basis of two indexes: "cultural customs and traditions" and "ethnic language". The results show that the ARABS not only highly incline towards Iranian-Islamic identity but also are integrated in their ethnic identity and their concern about their ethnic identity does not decrease their inclination toward national identity. Meanwhile the origins of some fragmentations should be explanted in such concrete indexes as economic and social Problems followed by "relative deprivation"; not in subjective ones

The present article try to explain rate of acceptance and/ or resistance of khozestanis' Arabic speakers in confront with globalization values, and would reply to the question, either do the fundamental globalization values cause the preeminence of ethnic identity among the Iranian Arabic speakers? In other words, what effects does the globalization values have on the particularism among the Iranian Arabic speakers and does the particularism come to exist due to effects of the globalization values? The survey method using interviews was applied in this research and all the Arabic speakers sample in Ahwaz and were 18 to 65 years old. According to Cochran formula 560 people were selected. For reliability and validity of data, cronbach alpha was used and to analyse the data variance and regression were applied. Analysis of data indicates that in parallel of the raise of deprivation feeling of equal opportunity in socio- cultural, political, economical and national possibilities, the tendency towards ethnical identities increased as well. Equal opportunity, ethnical justice feeling, humanitarian elements, foreign Medias and education were important and effective variables in acceptance of globalization values.

The pronunciation mechanism in the human vocal system enables the production of linguistic sounds of various types, and at levels of performance characterized by accuracy of language in transmitting the code sent from the brain to perform the sounds with specific waves understood by the members of speech community, and based on this the human pronunciation device is capable of producing linguistic voices of different types in all the languages of the world, and the lengths in vowels and consonant sounds commensurate with the nature of the production of language in each speech community. The difficulty in producing language voices in a language is by speakers of other language, that is how to train speech organs to produce the voices of language B just like the manner in which native speakers pronounce sounds. The languages of the world differ in the distribution of the phones and tend to use the easier in the areas of the center and the introduction of the mouth, unlike the Arabic language, which is witnessing the distribution of the output of the use of all areas of the pronunciation machine in the alphabetical voice. This research highlights the problems of the performance of sounds In the Arabic language of non-native speakers, despite the availability of the appropriate environment for language training on the production of the sounds of the Arabic language through the spread and transmission of the production of the Koranic text in some Aryan languages, and we chose the Persian language as model in the analysis of acoustic voices problem Producing a number of solutions that contribute to the education and control of the voices of the Arabic language in the production.

Translation is one of the main mediums of communication among nations of the world.Familiarity with culture and civilization of other nations requires knowledge of their language. Translation conveys concepts, sciences and cultural technology to other cultures and results in their growth and flourishing. Historical investigation shows that translation played a significant role in the transmission of foreign cultures to Arabic culture and helped it grow in Abbasid era. In this era, ARABS made connections with civilized nations such as Iran, India and Greece and translated many of their scientific writings. Translated works attracted translators and scientists attention and they began to study, interpret, criticize, and correct these works. This in turn paved the way for ARABS scientific revolution and soon they began to show initiatives and creativity and made great advances in different fields of science such as medicine, mathematics, astrology, chemistry, physics, philosophy and so on.

Background: Anthropological studies based on highly polymorphic HLA genes provide useful information for bone marrow donor registry, forensic medicine, disease association studies, as well as designing peptide vaccines against tumors, and infectious or autoimmune diseases.Objective: This study was designed to investigate the genetic relationship of Iranian ARABS and Jews using HLA-class II genetic diversity. Methods: HLA-DRB1, DQA1, and DQB1 allele frequencies and haplotypes were determined in 134 Iranian ARABS from two different communities and 91 Iranian Jews using PCR/RFLP and PCR/SSP methods. Results: Neighbor-joining analyses showed a closer genetic relationship between Iranian ARABS and Iranian Jews than between either Iranian ARABS and Middle Eastern ARABS or Iranian Jews and other Jews. The results of AMOVA test also revealed no significant difference between these populations and other Iranians. Conclusion: It seems that, Iranian ARABS are originally from the Iranian gene pool and speak Arabic due to their encounter with ARABS. Iranian gene flow to immigrant Jews followed by their expansion in this country may also explain the close genetic relationship among different Iranian ethnic groups.