In Iran's criminal law, humans are not only divided into wise or insane they are also persons who, on the one hand, do not fall under Article 149 of the Islamic Penal Code in the definition of insane persons and on the other hand, they are not wise, the rational age of these people is lower than their child's physical age that Affected by mental disorder and mental retardation. Article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code takes into account the many implications of this disorder, namely the lack of understanding of the dignity or the nature of criminal conduct and the existence of doubt in the development and perfection of the mind Which is called fool (weak-minded) in jurisprudence due to lack of intellect. These people are known as people with mental illness, including mental retardation, delirium, and dementia. According to Article 140 of the Act, which expresses the condition of criminal responsibility should not regard fool (weak-minded) accusation as having a criminal responsibility if any crime is committed. Because the penalty is based on criminal responsibility consequently, the condemnation of a perpetrator of a crime hodud or qesas is forbidden and even it should be said that the punishment mentioned in Article 89 of this law is also contemplative. Therefore, in accordance with law, they will be sentenced in the case of committing the above-mentioned offenses or taazir to Hedging and education activities. In the Egyptian law, dementia, inside, in the meaning of Disorders of the scorpion, has a madness sentence that is criticized.

The Egyptian Constitution of 1971 addressed the issue of the necessity of protecting the Constitution and established the Supreme Constitutional Court for this task. This body is currently is protecting the Constitution of 2014, as stipulated in Article 192 of the Constitution and Article 25 of the Supreme Constitutional Court of Egypt, as the task of "monitoring the constitutionality of statutes and regulations". While the laws in the Egyptian legal system are diverse, the effectiveness of the constitutional review system requires the adoption of ordinances to expand the scope of the Supreme Constitutional Court. One of these ordinances is that all laws are subject to the constitutional review of the Court. Accordingly, ordinary laws, Supplementary Constitutional Laws, laws approved by the referendum, abolished laws, parliamentary internal regulations, international treaties, and decisions of the president are subject to the constitutional review of the Supreme Constitutional Court. This is a mark of the effective and genuine constitutional review system in Egypt. However, the Constitutional Amendment rule is out of the constitutional review scope of the Supreme Constitutional Court. In this article, the efficiency of the constitutional review of statutes in the law of Egypt has been investigated.

Conspiracy in Egyptian Legislation is divided in two parts; General conspiracy and particular. Legislator of Iran in article 610 and 611, in the law of ta, zir, Have talked specially about conspiracy. In the first one has Generalized Criminalization of conspiracy into all offence against Internal and external security and in the second one has depend it into prepare of executive acts and Failure because of a cause outside the will. Unlike the Iranian legislator that has taken all conspiracy with any degree as a crime in Egyptian Legislation it embrace just Offenses and crimes. Also in particular conspiracy the Crimes are separated exactly and can't be leaded to Muharebe while in Iran's law it can be result in Muharebe in conspiracy against security and in other crimes its retribution hasn’ t any fitting whit offences against security. This article, that come to end whit Analytical and comparative method, has considered The law of Iran and Egypt and Legal doctrine and Expressed Difference and similarity and pay attention to distinctions between them and recommended Iranian legislator to added some acts and promote law.

Where the criminal behavior of the offender leads to a more intense outcome than the result he is seeking, there occurs a special case in which men’ s rea is a form of intention named "transcendent intention" and the offense of committing is called beyond intention. The basic condition for such crimes is the existence of a prior intention for a crime and a resultant crimes which goes beyond the original malice. . The basic question of the research is that what is the nature of this crime – psychologically-intentional or unintentional element? In this research, with an analytical-descriptive method aimed at explaining the nature and basis of such a state, it has been shown that crime is beyond the intentions of an independent nature between intentional and unintentional. There are examples of these types of crimes in Iran's law, and there are some concepts in Egyptian law without the use of this term in the law. It is necessary in the general discussion of criminal law to introduce a kind of intention under the title "Transitional Intent" and to add a type of crimes under the heading "Transgressions beyond intention" in the course of deliberate and unintentional offenses, and the penalties should be proportionate to the nature of the crime.

Failure to return all cerebellar and cerebellar cortex activities is called brain death. As the advancement of medical technology was first introduced in 1952 in the United States and a few years later in France, this concept was introduced. Today, most advanced countries in the world have accepted, through laws or judicial decisions, that death is due to the cessation of brain activity, and brain death is a definite death. The main causes of the importance of brain death and the efforts of lawmakers to explain its nature are the issue of organ transplants from brain deaths. Following the issue in Islamic countries, differences between jurisprudents and physicians have taken place and are still ongoing. More or less, brain death is accepted and legislated as a definitive death in some Islamic countries. In Iran, delayed brain death in western Iran in 2000 along with the issue of transplantation of organs and the unit entitled "The Law of Transplantation of Patients Dead or Patients whose Cold Death is Certain" entered into the official laws of the country, but in the laws of the country Egypt has not yet explicitly referred to the acceptance of brain death due to numerous controversies and controversy of the controversial jurisprudents, and it can only be deduced from this by law in Law No. 5 of 2010. This research has been conducted in a library method with the aim of comparative study and the discovery of the weaknesses and strengths of the rights of both countries in Iran and Egypt. In this case study, in general, it can be said that Iran's law on brain death is more enlightening and more advanced than the Egyptian laws.

Industrial Revolution which is supposed to be a landmark throughout the recent centuries, led to many changes in the country's legal system. As a result, despite the conservatism of family law, its tendency to be up-to-date is evident. Although Western family law systems have been reformed, passive acceptance of their approach is not suggested to other countries, namely Islamic land, because it is a defeated experience. So authors for suggesting new ideas in the face of modernity will evaluate the Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia family law systems. This article Industrial Revolution which is supposed to be a landmark throughout the recent centuries led to considerable changes in the country's legal system. As a result, despite the conservatism of family law, its tendency to be up-to-date is apparent. Although Western family law systems have been reformed, passive acceptance of their approach is not suggested to other countries, namely Islamic land, because it is a defeated experience. So authors for suggesting new ideas in the face of modernity will evaluate the Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia family law systems. This article shows that their moderate approach which is not considered a passive acceptance of Western reformation in the family law, is compatible with Islamic Law. Hence, this essay proposes to lawmakers and policymakers in the Islamic Republic of Iran to evaluate the approaches of Islamic countries such as Egypt, Morocco, and Tunisia.