مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

155
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

354
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Crushing analysis of the industrial cage mill and the laboratory jaw crusher

Pages

  155-161

Abstract

 Many research studies have been conducted on the liberation of locked minerals using a
crusher and comparing this device with the other devices. This paper reviews the liberation
of Middle coal by different methods of crushing force. In the Tabas coal washing plant,
particles of 0.5-50 mm size are processed through the heavy media method (using 3 Tri-flo
separators) and particles of 0-0.5 mm size are processed using the flotation method (using
6 column flotation cells). A Tri-flo separator with a diameter of 700 mm and the capacity
of 120 tons per hour is used for the cleaning of 6-50 mm raw coal particles. The study was
conducted using a laboratory Jaw crusher and a Cage mill with a specific Comminution ratio,
both crushing forces were analyzed with the same distribution and mechanism of production
of fines. In this study, grading and washability characteristics of a representative sample of
middle product were reviewed and the dimensions of the ash were measured for each section.
Intermediate product crushing using a laboratory Jaw crusher and an industrial Cage mill
were conducted at up to 5 mm size and 50 percent of final speed. The amount of coal released
after each section grading was determined by a sinking and floating test for size +0.5 mm and
release analysis and ash testing for smaller dimensions of -0.5, these tests were conducted
for each section product dimension. The results indicated that utilizing a Cage mill is more
effective than a laboratory Jaw crusher, resulting in 11-percent more yield with 12 ash. The
rate of fines produced through the laboratory Jaw crusher is less than the industrial Cage mill.

Multimedia

  • No record.
  • Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Zolfaghari, Reza, & Karamoozian, Mohammad. (2017). Crushing analysis of the industrial cage mill and the laboratory jaw crusher. JOURNAL OF PARTICLE SCIENC AND TECHNOLOGY, 3(3), 155-161. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/355040/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Zolfaghari Reza, Karamoozian Mohammad. Crushing analysis of the industrial cage mill and the laboratory jaw crusher. JOURNAL OF PARTICLE SCIENC AND TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2017;3(3):155-161. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/355040/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Reza Zolfaghari, and Mohammad Karamoozian, “Crushing analysis of the industrial cage mill and the laboratory jaw crusher,” JOURNAL OF PARTICLE SCIENC AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 155–161, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/355040/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button