ASSESSING STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE OF BANKS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MOTAMENI A.R.; JAVADZADEH M.; TIZFAHM M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES Year:2010 | Volume:1 | Issue:1 Page(s): 141-159

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

4,372

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ASSESSING STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE OF BANKS

Author(s)

MOTAMENI A.R. | JAVADZADEH M. | TIZFAHM M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONQ2

MULTI- CRITERIA DECISION-MAKINGQ2

FUZZY AHPQ3

TOPSISQ2

BANKQ2

Abstract

Banks and financial institutions play an important role in development of any country. Nowadays, due to the considerable number of BANKs, financial and credit institutions in the country, also according to privatization trend of public BANKs and transformation of them, their PERFORMANCE EVALUATION has become very important. The purpose of this article, is presenting a fuzzy MULTI- CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING method. In this survey, by using expert views and library research, PERFORMANCE EVALUATION criteria in financial and nonfinancial levels for three BANKs have been found, then by using FUZZY AHP method, criteria were given weight and finally the BANKs were ranked by using TOPSIS. In according to the achieved outcomes, non-financial outcomes are more important than financial performance. In evaluating financial performance, resource share criterion was the most important and profitability and ROA were placed afterwards. In evaluating non-financial factors pricing was the most important while quality of services and electronic BANKing were placed next. The results indicate that by merely having good financial performance, improvement in a BANK overall performance, could not be expected. In contrast to these results, PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONs often take place on the basis of financial and non-financial factors are given less credit in this respect.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MOTAMENI, A.R., JAVADZADEH, M., & TIZFAHM, M.. (2010). ASSESSING STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE OF BANKS. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 1(1), 141-159. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/181559/en

Vancouver: Copy

MOTAMENI A.R., JAVADZADEH M., TIZFAHM M.. ASSESSING STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE OF BANKS. JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES[Internet]. 2010;1(1):141-159. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/181559/en

IEEE: Copy

A.R. MOTAMENI, M. JAVADZADEH, and M. TIZFAHM, “ASSESSING STRATEGIC PERFORMANCE OF BANKS,” JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT STUDIES, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 141–159, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/181559/en

Related Journal Papers