Introduction: International disarmament CONVENTIONs lack necessary compliance and consistency by production and application of new generation WEAPONS, shortly after their development. Also by emergence of new threats of microbial WEAPONS, bioterrorism and development of new BIOLOGICAL technologies, the necessity of revising the content of these CONVENTIONs is felt. In this formative research, the stages of growth and development of BIOLOGICAL weaponry studies, international laws and CONVENTIONs on the prohibition of production, development and stockpiling of BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS is studied in an interdisciplinary setting and the necessity of revision and reform in these CONVENTIONs is proposed.Conclusion: Growth of BIOLOGICAL sciences in current century has been very fast, but development of international laws on control of military and weaponry trends of this science has been under the influence of weaponry authorities and developed governments and with no explicit prohibition of the use of these WEAPONS, has imposed restrictions on developing countries which want to achieve the peaceful aspects of BIOLOGICAL agents. Production of sustainable aerosols resistant to identification and detection techniques, will inevitably lead to CONVENTION's content reform.

Development and proliferation of CONVENTIONal WEAPONS has made it necessary to strengthen the international treaties for preventing the production, development and use of WEAPONS such as chemical, nuclear and ballistic missiles. The development and use of unCONVENTIONal WEAPONS, such as WEAPONS of mass destruction, in the past two decades have raised real concerns to legal, technical and medical terms. For these reasons, the chemical WEAPONS CONVENTION was ratified in 1996, and its organization is still active. On of the most dangerous kinds of WEAPONS of mass destruction are BIOLOGICAL or microbial agents. The Geneva protocol of 1925 and BW CONVENTION of 1975 were ratified to prevent the production and development of these WEAPONS. But by global advancement in biology, microbiology, biotechnology and genetic engineering, there have been novel innovations in industrial applications of microorganisms, hence the real need to prepare certain criteria to develop a list of agents along the same lines of the goals of the CONVENTION on BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS. On the other hand, the production and development of BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS and their application in military conflicts, bioterrorism, agroterrorism and ecoterrorism and the danger of the development of new agents is now a major threat against world security. Pandemics and epidemics of new infectious diseases like SARS, birds Flu, human monkey pox, Rift valley fever, and emerging and reemerging infectious agents are a new challenge for the medical and health communities. These threats necessitate the implementation of national biosafety and biosecurity measures in laboratories, research and industrial centers working with the listed agents. There has also been a call for an international code of conduct for scientists; this is the subject of discussion in the 2005 BWC meetings. Due to a lack of international or regional consensus on the list of BIOLOGICAL agents and toxin agents, it is crucial to study how to prepare a list of agents so that it can be used as a reference at national or international levels.In this study, we compare different lists available with agreed criteria with a view on devising a list of BIOLOGICAL agents and toxins as human pathogens for national or regional applications relevant to BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS CONVENTION. Nonetheless, due to geographical and environmental differences and epidemiology of infectious diseases, it will not be easy to make a single list for international applications. We, therefore, propose that national and regional lists be prepared.

Military medicine research is vital for protection against WEAPONS of mass destructions' specially threat of chemical and BIOLOGICAL warfare and bioterrorism. Great advances in the life sciences, like biotechnology, genetic engineering and molecular biology have created a pressing need for steps that must be taken to reduce this threat to humanity.The biosafety regulations and code of conduct for scientists may provide a tool nationally adopted by each state party to the BWC CONVENTION in implementation of its obligations under the CONVENTION and in accordance with its constitutional process and put into force within its territory.The scientists should be encouraged to convene seminars, workshops and prepare research papers to raise the awareness. Training programs and materials on biosafety regulations and, GLP (good laboratory practice) and biomedical ethics should also be improved and inserted in university curricula.Codes of conduct should not leave individuals and scientists with the impression that codes are designed against them or their scientific activities. Due respect should be extended to the scientific community as members of the society who serve the noble objectives of humanity through the advancement of science. Wider contributions by the scientists in promotion,The promotion of international scientific and technological cooperation and exchange of information according to article X of the BWC regarding results of scientific research constitutes yet another effective assurance for the use of bio sciences to remain peaceful. Codes of conduct should avoid any restrictions on exchange of scientific discoveries in the field of biology for research, development, prevention, diagnosis and treatment or disease and other peaceful purposes.

Military medicine and biodefense research is vital for protection against WEAPONS of mass destructions' specially threat of chemical and BIOLOGICAL warfare and bioterrorism. Great advances in the life sciences, like biotechnology, genetic engineering and molecular biology have created a pressing need for steps that must be taken to reduce this threat to humanity.The biosafety regulations and code of conduct for scientists may provide a tool nationally adopted by each state party to the -BWC CONVENTION in implementation of its obligations under the CONVENTION and in accordance with its constitutional process and put into force within its territory.The scientists should be encouraged to convene seminars, workshops and prepare research papers to raise the awareness. Training programs and materials on biosafety regulations and, GLP (good laboratory practice) and biomedical ethics should also be improved and inserted in university curricula.Codes of conduct should not leave individuals and scientists with the impression that codes are designed against them or their scientific activities. Due respect should be extended to the scientific community as members of the society who serve the noble objectives of humanity through the advancement of science. Wider contributions by the scientists in promotion.The promotion of international scientific and technological cooperation and exchange of information according to article X of the BWC regarding results of scientific research constitutes yet another effective assurance for the use of biosciences to remain peaceful.Codes of conduct should avoid any restrictions on exchange of scientific discoveries in the field of biology for research, development, prevention, diagnosis and treatment or disease and other peaceful purposes.

To investigate the effect of vermicompost, N fertilizer and their integration on growth, BIOLOGICAL and essential yields oil and its components in two populations (Varamin and Isfahan), an experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the field of Isfahan Medicinal Plants Research Center in 2016. Fertilizer treatments including 100% urea, vermicompost 33.3 and urea 66.6%, vermicompost 66.6 and urea 33.3%, 100% vermicompost and control treatment (without fertilizer) as the first factor and Varamin and Isfahan populations as the second factor were selected. The results showed that the interaction effects of nitrogen fertilizer and populations on all studied traits were significant. In both populations, nitrogen fertilizer improved height, BIOLOGICAL and essential oil yields, content of essential oil compounds (d-Carvone and its yield, α-phellandrene and linalool; except p-Cymene and Limonene in Isfahan population). Since in medicinal plants, the quantity (BIOLOGICAL yield) and quality (essential oil and d-Carvone; the most important ingredient and the highest amount of essential oil in this experiment), 66.6% vermicompost + 33.3% urea in Varamin population, was the best treatment in the experiment. In addition an in the direction of human health and sustainable agriculture, it is possible to reduce 33% of chemical fertilizers application and pollution; however, in terms of other essential oil contents (α-phellandrene, Linalool and p-Cymene), 100% vermicompost fertilizer treatment was superior in Isfahan population.

Today's humanitarian law is one of the basic pillars of preventing chaos in the international community. In practice, human rights have been able to prevent some of the human tragedies which, unfortunately, have emerged in recent years with the advent of various WEAPONS. The 1980 CONVENTION prohibits certain CONVENTIONal WEAPONS by prohibiting or even limiting certain WEAPONS from creating a suitable environment for wars to do anything. Humanitarian law is at the beginning of its work and can not be expected to function as fully functional and effective as domestic law and to be considered a definite obstacle to dealing with these war crimes and human beings, while in the formation of domestic law in its modern sense It has also been. One of the most important human rights CONVENTIONs of the 1980 CONVENTION is CONVENTIONal WEAPONS. The main purpose of the CONVENTION on CONVENTIONal WEAPONS is to provide better legal protection than civilians in armed conflicts. In fact, the CONVENTION and its annexed protocols, based on international humanitarian law, govern the use of CONVENTIONal CONVENTIONal WEAPONS as well as new CONVENTIONal WEAPONS.

One of the strong security concerns in the conflict and regional and international wars is the concern about the use of chemical WEAPONS, which unfortunately, unlike nuclear WEAPONS, is in the hands of most countries in the world. Extremely destructive effects of the use of this weapon on the environment and humans, and especially civilians and civilians, have led international organizations to move towards the CONVENTION on the Prohibition of Chemical WEAPONS and, accordingly, require countries to use WEAPONS that are under no circumstances Chemical WEAPONS. It is true that such restrictions require precise anticipation of the implementation of the guarantee because they are the abusive and the states that, despite the restrictions and the imposition of international pressure on the use of chemical WEAPONS, provide part of the guarantee through ICC and include the competencies of this Mor And another part of the UN itself through the Security Council by imposing sanctions, limitation or military action, justifying the doctrine of responsibility for humanitarian protection and action. In the present research, which is descriptive and analytical, we intend to study and consider whether the use of chemical WEAPONS falls within the scope of ICC competencies in order to enable this authority to pursue it.