One of the common doubts in commentating the verse: There is no compulsion in religion, has been considered as the problem of disagreement between primary holy war in Islam and the meaning of the verse. By the verse is meant real negation of every compulsion in Divine religion, every internal compulsion for making people to accept religion and every external compulsion in the realm of Divine religion. None of these cases disagree with Divine will and compulsion to the sovereignty of His religion. Commentators have presented different solutions for the problem among which the best one is the necessity of predicating the verses of unconditioned holy war to conditioned ones. None of the verses in the field, therefore, may be regarded as unconditioned, yet all are conditioned to such limits as encroachment, warfare, injustice, harassment etc.

Despite differences in jurisprudential branches, Islamic sects share a common perspective on the issue of apostasy. Some may question the verses regarding apostasy due to their focus on the specific function of the verse "There is no compulsion. . . ". Consequently, scholars have proposed various responses to these challenges. Research utilizing the library method, scientific analysis, and reflection on the intra-and extra-textual evidence surrounding the verses of apostasy and those addressing no compulsion seeks to demonstrate the hypothesis that the meaning of non-compulsion in the verse is rooted in the verbal and initial acceptance of the religion of Islam,thus, Islamic society does not coerce non-Muslims into accepting the religion without heartfelt conviction. On the other hand, an apostate who has chosen the religion of Islam out of their own free will and subsequently departs from it, declaring their departure, causes negative repercussions such as creating doubt within the religious community and becoming subject to punitive rulings. Therefore, the function of the verse regarding no compulsion does not conflict with the issue of apostasy in this regard, and there is no contradiction between the punitive rulings of apostasy and the concept of no compulsion in religion. This is supported by apostasy rulings in various religions that do not mandate conversion to their faith. Nonetheless, their leaders have reacted more severely to apostasy than the leaders of Islam.

The Holy Quran has a form and a meaning; this feature is one of the reasons of Quran’s eternality according to which the public people cannot have a full understanding of its reality and secrets. The verses pointing to this reality are verses 77-79 of Al-Waqi’a being called “Mass” verses. Investigating the commentary resources of Fariqain shows that there is a deep relation between the verses ‘Mas’ and ‘Tathir’. The results of the study indicate that a regular jurisprudential inference of the verse ‘Mas’ i.e. forbidden touch of the Holy Quran’s verses without Taharat is void of a strong reason. In accordance with this verse, the real commentators are those who have been in contact with divine verses with their pure existence and have reached the degree of innocence. Therefore, enjoying a pure conscience and having moved effectively in the path of journey toward God and having achieved an amount of appearance and conscience purity, they have had advantages from that source of reality to the extent of their existence capacity, spiritual greatness and conscience purity and they make it available for other people.

The right to practice religion is one of the fundamental issues at the present time. This study seeks to examine how, if a person is free to choose a religion, this right corresponds with the rulings such as apostasy or primary jihad? The interpretation of some verses, especially the verse «لا إِکْ راهَ فِی الدِّین » "La ikrah fi al-din. . . " indicates that from the perspective of the Holy Qur'an, the right to practice religion is one of the basic human rights. The present study shows that God the Almighty has not forced human to accept a particular religion rather he has given them the right and freedom to choose a religion. There is no contradiction between the freedom of conscience [and the right to exercise religion] and the ruling of apostasy or Primary Jihad. However, a misunderstanding of the real life, in some cases, may seriously stop one from accessing the right to exercise religion.

Several verses in the Qurʼan assert that enforcement of belief on others is not appreciated and that acceptance of religion is a matter of choice. In contrast to these verses, there are many verses that order the believers to fight the infidels in order to spread the divine religion. These verses have been interpreted as though the infidels and polytheists have to choose between embracing Islam or been killed. This induction is not only in apparent contradiction with the former verses, it has also led to various critiques of Islam accusing it of restricting the freedom of belief. Perceptions of other Islamic provisions such as the punishment of apostates and other traditions has also fueled these doubts. Reviewing the approaches to the negation of compulsion in religion, this article, based on descriptive-analytical method, has classified the verses on fighting the infidels and sets out to answer the questions posed by considering the apparent meaning of the verses as well as the context and historical evidences. Accurate analysis and documentation of these verses indicates that compulsion in religion is neither possible nor desirable, and in this verdict, there is no difference between different groups of non-Muslims. Nevertheless, according to Islam both the foundation and maintenance of a monotheistic religion is considered as a legal human right. Therefore, both primitive and defending Jihad is actually a defense of human rights. In conclusion, this study leads to this fact that Islam's fight against all the signs of polytheism and paganism is completely rational, without leading to compulsion in religion.

With the first look at the appearance of the verse "La ikraha fi al-din" compared to the verses of qital and jihadi ibtidae`i and the verses threatening non-Muslims with punishment and the verses of non-acceptance of religions other than Islam and the verse of Mubahilih, outwardly it seems probable that Islam disagrees with freedom and the right to choose and, therefore, seeks to impose belief, and this suspicion can lead to the weakening of faith and the weakness of Muslim adherence, and non-Muslims` fleeing from the religion of truth. Therefore, in this research-descriptive article, trying to repel the hidden objection, from among the conflicting verses, the verse Mubahilih has been chosen in terms of its multifacetedness, and by studying the interpretative sources and with convincing arguments, it has been determined that the verse "la ikraha" with theological-philosophical approach, emphasized the inevitability of belief, which is an internal matter, but with a political-security approach, the Mubahlah verse, while revealing the truth and verifying the reality, is trying to increase the security of the Islamic system and to raise public opinion for the rule of the Ahl al-Bayt (a) and to provide Imamate after the death of the Holy Prophet (s),not that he wants to turn Christians away from their religion. Therefore, there is no conflict between these two verses.

The Quranic sentence "There is no compulsion in religion" has been interpreted differently by commentators in different periods. Some has taken it as the permission for freedom of belief from the verse and some has considered it in conflict with the verses of fighting and apostasy. The distinction and diversity of the commentators' understanding of the verses of the Qur'an is related to the mental presuppositions of the commentator from one hand and from the other hand to the historical factors and the intellectual and philosophical atmosphere of each period,as wiewed today due to the modern philosophy that human freedom in accepting religion has been known to be people`s undeniable right. This article has tried to re-interpret the above Qur'anic sentence in the framework of the theory of coherence and continuity of the Qur'an. Based on the theory of coherence, the interpretation of the verses should be based on the general spirit of the Qur'an and in relation to all the main elements and concepts of the text of the Holy Qur'an. This study has shown that the mentioned sentenc confirms the right to freedom of belief and choice of religion for human beings and the rulings related to fighting and jihad in the framework of the theory of Qur'anic coherence should not be considered contrary to this Qur'anic doctrine. According to some commentators, it is related to special historical-social conditions.

There are various ways to express the overall intention and focal points of a text, and keywords might be the most appropriate choice. Keywords are defined as the most prominent phrases in a document that convey its main message. By extracting relevant words and phrases from a text, keyword extraction can help to uncover meaningful patterns in the text and provide an overview of the content. It can also help highlight the most significant concepts in a text and focus the attention of a machine learning algorithm on them. Keyword extraction is an imperative subtask of natural language processing. By reducing the complexity of the text and making it easier to process, keyword extraction can be used as the basis for many other processing tasks such as text classification, clustering, and summarization. By extracting keywords from text, a machine can better understand the meaning and context of the text. This enables it to better analyze the text, recognize patterns, and make more accurate decisions. It can also reduce the amount of time it takes to process the text by eliminating unnecessary words and focusing on the most important words. Many datasets are proposed for evaluating keyword extraction methods in Persian, most of which only contain authors’ keywords and do not cover all potential ones. Thus, using such datasets leads to incorrect judgments about the accuracy of the suggested supervised and unsupervised methods. In this paper, we introduce Noor-Vajeh, a Persian keyword extraction dataset of about 1400 scientific papers. We asked experts to extract potential keywords besides the authors’ keywords to complete the keywords set for each article. The resulting dataset is a valuable resource for ongoing research into Persian keyword extraction. To evaluate the dataset to be used as a benchmark, we tested several unsupervised keyword extraction methods. We used these methods because, compared to supervised methods, they take less time to execute and require minimal to no manual tuning. Moreover, they are able to extract keywords with a high degree of accuracy and generalize well to different articles. Furthermore, due to the wide variety of categories of unsupervised learning methods, graph-based methods have been regularly applied in different projects, so we describe and use some of their most famous ones, such as TextRank, SingleRank, and PositionRank. These algorithms can identify important words and phrases in a given text, as well as identify relationships between them. Doing so can provide insights into the overall structure and meaning of the text. This makes them especially useful for finding patterns and making predictions in a variety of tasks, such as machine translation, text summarization, and sentiment analysis. Furthermore, graph-based methods are highly versatile and can be adapted to different datasets and tasks. This makes them ideal for use in benchmark datasets. The results inferred from these methods confirm the comparisons made between the methods employed in other papers.

Many commentators have considered the phrase “, and do not cast yourselves with your own hands into destruction”,(al-Baqarah: 195) related to its contiguous verses and do not believe in its generality so they have presented different perceptions about it. Different commentators regard this verse as either a prohibition on Infā, q, or a prohibition on extravagance in Infā, q, or a prohibition on stopping Infā, q, or a prohibition on Infā, q during Jihā, d, or a prohibition on Jihā, d itself and so on. Due to the subjectivity of making a relation between each of the levels, incompatibility with the revelation of the verse, and inappropriate perceptions of the narrations, the aforementioned interpretations are seriously taken into reconsideration because regarding the independence of the different sections of Surah al-Baqrah, the general perceptions of Ahl al-Bayt and jurisprudence writers about the verse as well as confusion in the spread of relationship, this verse is independent from its contiguous verses. This research was conducted by library study along with the assessment of different theories on the exegesis of the verse and it aims to criticize the perceptions relying on the relationship between this verse and its contiguous verses in order to prove its independence.