In the review of literary approaches and the creation of attitudinal and writing systems, we are faced with four paradigms. That is, reduction-addition systems, eclectic systems, system-likes, and additive-concrete systems. While presenting this division, Arash Azarpeyk considers the horizontal, pragmatic as well as problematic presentation by this concept to be the reason for it, Therefore, in this article, by examining these four systems, we will state that the approach of ecofeminism is an eclectic approach that always tries to consider women and the earth as oppressed phenomena in patriarchal systems. The critical approach of Farafeminism, with regard to the additive-concrete system, beyond all limited frameworks of women-oriented and men-oriented, seeks to present the division of different type of subjects from Azarpeyk's point of view and believes that by changing the male subject to a female subject, ecofeminism is trying to categorize all existences including the earth-in a hierarchical approach and in another field, with a female-oriented view. In naturalistic literature, According to the two fundamental principles of "absence of any dualism" and "absence of any attribution", the principle and foundation of Earthsubjectivity in Orianism is proposed. Earth-subjectivity is a critical approach to all the ideas in which man is known as the identical subject who is always seeking valuation. In this article, which is done in a descriptive and analytical method by using library resources, the naturalistic literature is examined with regard to the approach of the third genus and the presentation of human-centered feminism and human-centered patriarchy ideas.

Land-subjectivity, according to the view of Orianist existentialism view, introduces the approach of synergistic existence (i. e., existence beyond synergy). Existential coexistence (Existence beyond coexistence) Beyond the coherence of areas is the form of the existence of an being that transcends any dualism that is specific to humanist philosophy,Therefore, in examining the opposition between the two views of Land-subjectivity and humansubjectivity, by introducing a critical posthumanist and Faratradition attitude in the view of the originality of the land, the selfbased and permanently oriented man who always emphasizes dualism and objectivism in humanist philosophy Is criticized. In this view, it is also stated that it is fundamentally wrong to separate the two approaches of existence and being,The existence of the earth is always dependent on its beings, and this existence would not have any meaning without the existence of a homogeneous pair,Thus, omnipresence has multiple domains of existence that believe in the pairing of phenomena, not their dualism. Also, this article, which was done in a descriptive-analytical method by using library resources, examines the attitude of ecofeminism. In this view, woman and earth are considered one. Of course, the Landsubjectivity view, with regard to the critical point of view of Farafeminism and humanistic feminist and masculine-approaches, Of course, the geopolitical view, with regard to the critical point of view of extra-feminism and the feminist and masculine-humanistic approach, proposes existential equality, not existential analogy. It also introduces the naturalistic literature and states that the attitude of the originality of the earth (Land-subjectivity) always follows the two basic elements of no dualism and no adjectives.