“What is the essential believes of a mature human being or perfect personality from Quran’s viewpoint? The present article is going to respond to this question; but first of all, we will explain some of the essential characteristics of Quranic anthropology which is the basis of its studies concerning perfect personality. Then, we will take into consideration the concepts of healthy and sickness from etymological and Quranic point of view.We will also discuss of the series of human being’s fundamental believes from Quran viewpoint, with explaining the role of attitudes in the health of personality. In this system, believe in the existence of God and his names and attributes is the basis of all knowledge. Other five Quranic believes which depended on this essential believe, are principles that formulate a healthy personality.This believes are as follow: Believe in the purposefulness of creation; traditions that dominated on the world; believe in concept of life and pure life, Believe in resurrection and role of person in determination of his destiny.

Leaders' beliefs and their perceptions of the threat are an important part of the reason for the continued hostility between states in the international system. Regardless of the extent of the actual threat from the enemy and its aftermath, as well as ignoring the fact that many governments act not only for the threat but for the sake of security concerns and how the leaders of the two countries perceive the nature of the threat, it can yield results. It will lead to something different. This article examines the role of the leaders of the two United States and North Korean leaders over the past decades and their perceptions of the threat to assess the reason for the continuing hostility between the two countries. The hypothesis of this paper is based on the hostile perception of the intentions of the other party and any action as an attempt to threaten the security and different assessments of the extent of the threat that have sustained the failure to reach a final peace solution. The research method in this study is causal explanation and type of applied research.

Objectives The present study aims to examine the relationship of irrational relationship beliefs and sexual function with marital satisfaction in Iranian men mediated by basic psychological needs. Methods This is a descriptive-correlational study using structural equation modeling. Participants were 357 men who visited the Aram clinic in Tehran (District 1), Iran, in 2022, who were selected using the purposive sampling method and based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. To collect data, the ENRICH Marital Life Satisfaction Scale, Eidelson and Epstein’s Relationship Belief Inventory, Rosen et al. ’s Male Sexual Health Questionnaire, and LaGuardia et al. ’s Basic Needs Satisfaction in General Scale were used. were used. For statistical analysis, SEM was used in Amos software, version 24. Results The results of data analysis showed irrational relationship beliefs had a negative relationship with marital satisfaction (r=-0. 41,P<0. 01), while sexual function (r=0. 46,P<0. 01) and basic psychological needs (r=0. 56,P<0. 01) had a positive relationship with marital satisfaction. Also, the indirect relationship between irrational relationship beliefs and marital satisfaction was negative and significant(β=-0. 189, P=0. 001), and the indirect relationship between sexual function and marital satisfaction was positive and significant (β=0. 116, P=0. 001). Conclusion Irrational relationship beliefs and sexual function are associated with the marital satisfaction of men through basic psychological needs. Therefore, changing irrational beliefs, improving sexual function, and satisfying basic psychological needs in men can lead to improved marital satisfaction.

Was Hume really a skeptic empiricist? The common picture that existed about Hume sometime ago outlined him as an empiricist who, contrary to his preceding empiricists, could deduce skepticism which was a corollary of empiricism from it. According to this interpretation, Hume's entire project is negation and rejection of metaphysical knowledge as well as a science based on principles of empiricism. However, in the first half of twentieth century, David Camp Smith presented a more positive interpretation of Hume. According to his interpretation, Hume's objective is not entirely negating and rejecting; rather, his prime purpose is to indicate that man's fundamental beliefs, which according to the principles of empiricism are not adoptable from experience or intellect, are originated from human nature, and, somehow, the nature imposes them on us. This analysis by Smith transforms Hume from a skeptic empiricist into a naturalist philosopher. The present paper seeks to make a brief comparison between these two interpretations on Hume.