A Critical Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Evidences of Intervening Substitute (Badal Ḥ eilū la)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

hossini fazel seyedmorteza; ZIAEY MOHAMMAD ADEL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Jurisprudence and Fundamentals of Islamic Law Year:2019 | Volume:51 | Issue:2 Page(s): 369-385

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

848

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Critical Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Evidences of Intervening Substitute (Badal Ḥ eilū la)

Author(s)

hossini fazel seyedmorteza | ZIAEY MOHAMMAD ADEL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

intervening substitute (badal ḥeilūla)Q1

LiabilityQ2

lossQ2

usurpationQ2

usurped propertyQ2

Abstract

In Islamic jurisprudence, in addition to the prohibition of appropriation of others’ properties by the guarantor, it is obligatory for him to return the usurped property to its owner-whether he is a usurper or not. But, if returning the usurped property is not possible, the usurper is obliged to give back its substitute to the owner until the usurped property becomes possible to return. This injunction which is known as the intervening substitute (badal ḥ eilū la) is approved by Imā miyya jurists and consequently the Civil Code and some Sunni jurists. Disputes regarding the legitimacy of the intervening substitute and challenges resulting from implementing this injunction, like inclusion of new claims to cases like the claim of the guarantor regarding the appropriations of the one whose property is usurped from the substitute, and consequently lengthening the proceedings and their implementation make the reappraisal of the jurisprudential evidences of this injunction necessary. Investigating these evidences reveals that, firstly, the verbal evidences of this injunction do not have direct relationship to the issue and secondly refer to, at most the necessity of compensating for losses and not how to do so. Nonverbal evidences in proving this injunction, even if we accept them, refer to advisory (irshā dī ) injunctions not binding (mawlawī ) ones. As a result, at least in cases resulting from non-forcible appropriation in order to compensate for the losses of the owner until the real property is returned, in addition to the intervening substitute, other reasonable methods like paying the equivalent remuneration (ujrat al-mithl) of the usurped property to the owner can be utilized which have less challenges and difficulties.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

hossini fazel, seyedmorteza, & ZIAEY, MOHAMMAD ADEL. (2019). A Critical Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Evidences of Intervening Substitute (Badal Ḥ eilū la). FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), 51(2 ), 369-385. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/198539/en

Vancouver: Copy

hossini fazel seyedmorteza, ZIAEY MOHAMMAD ADEL. A Critical Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Evidences of Intervening Substitute (Badal Ḥ eilū la). FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA)[Internet]. 2019;51(2 ):369-385. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/198539/en

IEEE: Copy

seyedmorteza hossini fazel, and MOHAMMAD ADEL ZIAEY, “A Critical Evaluation of the Jurisprudential Evidences of Intervening Substitute (Badal Ḥ eilū la),” FEQH VA MABANI-YE HOQUQ-E ESLAMI (IRANIAN JOURNAL FOR JURISPRUDENCE & ESSENTIALS OF THE ISLAMIC LAW) (MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA), vol. 51, no. 2 , pp. 369–385, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/198539/en

Related Journal Papers