The processology of deriving the ruling from the challenge of the conflict between narrative reason and rational reason

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Nazari Abootaaleb; Nourozi Morteza; Akhlaghi Amiri Hassanali

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Studies of Islamic Jurisprudence and Basis of Law Year:2023 | Volume:17 | Issue:48 Page(s): 285-302

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The processology of deriving the ruling from the challenge of the conflict between narrative reason and rational reason

Author(s)

Nazari Abootaaleb | Nourozi Morteza | Akhlaghi Amiri Hassanali | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Shia jurisprudence

inference of Sharia ruling

conflict of evidence

ijtihad

Principles of Jurisprudence

Abstract

The derivation of a jurisprudential ruling in a certain path and mechanism sometimes faces challenges that the mujtahid must find a solution to get out of it and complete the issuance of the ruling. One of these challenges is the conflict between a narrative reason and a rational reason, the mechanism of reaching its conclusion is the problem of this research, and since it does not have a rich background, it is also an indicator of the novelty of this article compared to similar works. This research in the interdisciplinary geography of jurisprudence and principles, and in a descriptive, analytical way, the process of how to overcome the challenge of the conflict between narrative reason and rational reason has been the focus of its main question. The findings of this research show that in the conflict between narrative and rational reason, if the narrative reason is valid, in the assumption of conflict with unnecessary rational reason, the narrative reason takes precedence, and if the rational reason is one of necessity and certainties, then the rational reason takes precedence over the narrative. The Usulists of Ahl al-Sunnah have a consensus that in the conflict between qiyas and single news, if it is not possible to combine them, the reason of suspicion is preferable; But they differ on which one of these two is preferable; But from the Shiite point of view, due to the inauthenticity of "Qiyas", such a conflict does not arise.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans