Search Result

40890

Results Found

Relevance

Filter

Newest

Filter

Most Viewed

Filter

Most Downloaded

Filter

Most Cited

Filter

Pages Count

4089

Go To Page

Search Results/Filters    

Filters

Year

Banks



Expert Group











Full-Text


مرکز اطلاعات علمی SID1
اسکوپوس
مرکز اطلاعات علمی SID
ریسرچگیت
strs
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    1383
  • Volume: 

    28
  • Issue: 

    1
  • Pages: 

    15-18
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    1
  • Views: 

    753
  • Downloads: 

    30
Keywords: 
Abstract: 

مرور مدون یا نظام مند (Systematic review) بازنگری علمی به پژوهشهای موجود می باشد و با بکارگیری روشی معین، منظم، واضح و رده بندی شده نوشته  می شود تا خطای آماری و تورش (Bias) را به حداقل برساند. هدف از مرور مدون فراهم آوردن پاسخ شفاف و روشن به یک  پرسش علمی است. برای رسیدن به این هدف تلاش می شود که تمام پژوهشهای موجود راجع به موضوع پرسش شناسایی شده و از نظر کیفیت متدولوژی، بر اساس روشهای استاندارد ارزیابی شوند. سپس یافته های پژوهشهای قابل قبول جمع بندی شده و نتیجه نهایی استخراج شده، به صورت خلاصه، برای خوانندگان آورده می شود. چنانچه یافته ها از طریق کمی شوند، مقاله  مروری را متاآنالیز می نامند.مقاله مروری غیر مدون یا سنتی بصورت کلی به یک موضوع می پردازد. پژوهشهای موجود راجع به موضوع مورد بحث معرفی و شرح داده می شوند ولی از نظر متدولوژی ارزیابی نمی شوند. خود مقاله هم لزوما متدولوژی شناخته شده را به کار نمی گیرد و فاقد چهارچوب مشخص می باشد. به طور خلاصه مرور سنتی بیشتر نشان دهنده نظر شخصی و تجربه نویسنده مقاله است تا این که بازنگری علمی و پژوهشی می باشد.

Yearly Impact:

View 753

Download 30 Citation 1 Refrence 0
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2004
  • Volume: 

    14
  • Issue: 

    44
  • Pages: 

    94-105
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    1
  • Views: 

    1391
  • Downloads: 

    505
Abstract: 

Background and purpose: Low back pain (LBP) is a common and costly problem during pregnancy and assumes to be a part of normal pregnancy caused by normal physiological changes. Pregnancy-related LBP is one of the main reasons for disability, absence from work and responsible for huge direct and indirect economical impact.  This article Systematically reviews papers concerning the epidemiology and risk factors on LBP in pregnant women.  Materials and methods: MEDLINE, CINAHL, Rose-Net, OVID, and BIDS were searched for the period of 1985-2003, using the key words 'low back pain', 'epidemiology', 'pregnancy', 'risk factors'. In addition, references given in relevant publications were used. Results: Eighteen studies were identified. Eleven studies investigated epidemiology of LBP during pregnancy and the prevalence were reported >50% in 8 (73%) studies.  Ten studies were carried out on the epidemiology of LBP after pregnancy.  The prevalence of LBP were reported >40% in 6 (60%) studies.  Among different reported risk factors, previous LBP as well as younger age were the most important risk factors. Conclusion: Although there were some methodological flaws (e.g., small sample size of the study population, lack of clear classification and definition for LBP, different study design, different methods of study implementation, etc.) which precludes strong conclusion, it appears that LBP is one of the most common problem, during pregnancy and after delivery. It should also be noted that education and certain exercises can be beneficial to the pregnant women in the absence of medical complications.

Yearly Impact:

View 1391

Download 505 Citation 1 Refrence 0
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2010
  • Volume: 

    34
  • Issue: 

    3
  • Pages: 

    203-207
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    0
  • Views: 

    21062
  • Downloads: 

    6588
Abstract: 

Background: Successful clinical decisions are the outcome of a complex process. In making them, we draw on information from scientific evidences, our personal experience and external rules and constraints. Considering that the explosive increase in the amount and quality of the scientific evidence that has come from both the laboratory bench and the bedside, we may lack the time, motivation, and basic skills needed to find, critically appraise, and synthesize information. Fortunately, Systematic reviews help us and answer sharply defined clinical questions. This article deals with two questions; a: what is a Systematic review and, b: how should we organize it? Methods: We searched MEDLINE database with search terms of Systematic review and narrative review, restricted to English language, without time limitation. Then we selected those articles written by renowned experts. Results: There are two types of review articles: narrative review and Systematic review. Narrative review has been the conventional method for writing review articles; since it is subjective, it may be subject to error and bias; in areas where there is lack or paucity of evidence, the narrative review may still be the best writing method. Systematic review is the precise, Systematic and classified method of reviewing the existing data and evidences. It is objective, constructive and comprehensive and has much less error and bias than the narrative review.Conclusion: Systematic reviews are thus a vital link in the great chain of evidence that stretches from the laboratory bench to the bedside. It is absolutely essential for targeting these goals, for writing a Systematic review, a fully trained team with an expert leader and a precise protocol is essential.

Yearly Impact:

View 21062

Download 6588 Citation 0 Refrence 0
گارگاه ها آموزشی
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2020
  • Volume: 

    14
  • Issue: 

    2
  • Pages: 

    101-107
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    511
  • Views: 

    573
  • Downloads: 

    64
Abstract: 

Background: In the outbreak of infectious diseases, non-pharmacological intervention might be the only available protection tools. The aim of this Systematic review is to investigate whether it is or is not necessary to wear masks in new corona virus (COVID-19) outbreaks in the community. Methods: On February, 28, 2020, related databases were searched with the following keywords: "COVID-19"; "COVID 19"; 2019-nCoV; 2019-CoV; coronavirus; mask* and facemask. We updated the search in March 13, 2020. A total of 982 relevant reports were identified after removing duplicates. Of these, 71 references were screened based on titles and abstracts. After excluding unrelated studies, 36 studies were included in the full-text review and were assessed for eligibility. Finally, 3 articles met our inclusion criteria. Results: In three wards of hospital with more exposure to infected patients, wearing the N95 respirator while using regular disinfectants and hand hygiene, was a better way to prevent COVID-19 transmission from patients to nurses and physicians when compared to non-users of masks. Another study on family members with a history of travelling to Wuhan, showed that those who had worn a surgical mask only during the hospital visit, were infected. However, the 7 years old child of the family who wore a surgical mask, was not found to be infected by COVID-19. Finally, none of eleven healthcare workers who had unprotected exposure with confirmed cases were infected. Conclusion: Due to the newness of the COVID-19 virus, no clinical trials have been found regarding the use of the masks in the prevention of the disease, and the level of evidence were low.

Yearly Impact:

View 573

Download 64 Citation 511 Refrence 3577
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2021
  • Volume: 

    12
  • Issue: 

    -
  • Pages: 

    0-0
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    0
  • Views: 

    1077
  • Downloads: 

    234
Abstract: 

In recent years, published Systematic reviews in the world and in Iran have been increasing. These studies are an important resource to answer evidence‑, based clinical questions and assist health policy‑, makers and students who want to identify evidence gaps in published research. Systematic review studies, with or without meta‑, analysis, synthesize all available evidence from studies focused on the same research question. In this study, the steps for a Systematic review such as research question design and identification, the search for qualified published studies, the extraction and synthesis of information that pertain to the research question, and interpretation of the results are presented in details. This will be helpful to all interested researchers.

Yearly Impact:

View 1077

Download 234 Citation 0 Refrence 0
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    1398
  • Volume: 

    37
  • Issue: 

    2
  • Pages: 

    60-61
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    0
  • Views: 

    198
  • Downloads: 

    83
Keywords: 
Abstract: 

امروزه همگام با پیشرفت سریع و روز افزون علوم پزشکی شاهد افزایش مستمر مقالات علمی و به تبع آن تعداد مجلات در دنیا می باشیم. در واقع یک مقاله علمی معتبر، ماحصل سخت کوشی و تلاش پژوهشگران و نویسندگان درانجام یک پروژه تحقیقاتی و در نهایت ثبت و نگارش یافته های آن می باشد. ...

Yearly Impact:

View 198

Download 83 Citation 0 Refrence 0
strs
Author(s): 

ERNST E.

Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2008
  • Volume: 

    337
  • Issue: 

    17
  • Pages: 

    2813-2813
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    387
  • Views: 

    10479
  • Downloads: 

    15774
Keywords: 
Abstract: 

Yearly Impact:

View 10479

Download 15774 Citation 387 Refrence 0
Author(s): 

Azari Amir A. | Arabi Amir

Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2020
  • Volume: 

    15
  • Issue: 

    3
  • Pages: 

    372-395
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    0
  • Views: 

    2068
  • Downloads: 

    827
Abstract: 

Conjunctivitis is a commonly encountered condition in ophthalmology clinics throughout the world. In the management of suspected cases of conjunctivitis, alarming signs for more serious intraocular conditions, such as severe pain, decreased vision, and painful pupillary reaction, must be considered. Additionally, a thorough medical and ophthalmic history should be obtained and a thorough physical examination should be done in patients with atypical findings and chronic course. Concurrent physical exam findings with relevant history may reveal the presence of a systemic condition with involvement of the conjunctiva. Viral conjunctivitis remains to be the most common overall cause of conjunctivitis. Bacterial conjunctivitis is encountered less frequently and it is the second most common cause of infectious conjunctivitis. Allergic conjunctivitis is encountered in nearly half of the population and the findings include itching, mucoid discharge, chemosis, and eyelid edema. Long-term usage of eye drops with preservatives in a patient with conjunctival irritation and discharge points to the toxic conjunctivitis as the underlying etiology. Effective management of conjunctivitis includes timely diagnosis, appropriate differentiation of the various etiologies, and appropriate treatment.

Yearly Impact:

View 2068

Download 827 Citation 0 Refrence 0
Author(s): 

Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2018
  • Volume: 

    18
  • Issue: 

    1
  • Pages: 

    0-0
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    792
  • Views: 

    4844
  • Downloads: 

    17315
Keywords: 
Abstract: 

Yearly Impact:

View 4844

Download 17315 Citation 792 Refrence 0
Issue Info: 
  • Year: 

    2013
  • Volume: 

    1
  • Issue: 

    1
  • Pages: 

    51-61
Measures: 
  • Citations: 

    1098
  • Views: 

    3761
  • Downloads: 

    1401
Abstract: 

review articles are divided by two categories including narrative and Systematic reviews. Systematic review assesses related studies using a scientific planned method to answer a relevant research question.The overall structure of a Systematic review is comprised of seeking and finding related studies, apprising them according to clear criteria, combining the results and presenting them obviously and succinctly. This type of review helps decision makers to decide correctly regard to a topic which has been examined in various studies. Systematic review needs achieving experience and having enough time and the authors should have sufficient authority on the topic. Relatively identical processes have been suggested by different authors that usually include formulating the research question, setting the research protocol, literature search, extracting data, quality assessment, data analysis and presenting the data, and results interpretation. Performing these stages needs to consider the protocol or plan that usually has developed by the authors before beginning the study and following it may avoid any bios and deviation from the research line.The sections that are in a research article such as abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion should also be considered in a Systematic review article.

Yearly Impact:

View 3761

Download 1401 Citation 1098 Refrence 0
litScript