Through the implementation of the multiple intelligences, teachers andpractitioners will see an increase in their students’ performance and abilityto learn languages. The application of multiple intelligences theory issuggested as a structured way to address and understand the holistic natureof learners’ diversity. It is a favorable tool for teachers to increase theattractiveness of language learning tasks and, therefore, create motivationalconditions. Intelligence is not just a single construct which traditionally wasassumed to be constant throughout a person’ s life; individual’ s profiles ofintelligence differ in terms of encouragement, training, and circumstances toenquire materials eliciting particular intelligences. The present study was anattempt to investigate types of intelligences (linguistic, logicalmathematical, visual, kinesthetic, musical, interpersonal, and intrapersonal)as predictors of self-efficacy (generalized self-efficacy, academic selfefficacy, and self-regulatory efficacy). The participants were 148 male andfemale Iranian B. A. students majoring in TEFL and Translation at theIslamic Azad University in Malayer. The instruments included a 100-itemMichigan test, Gardner’ s MI questionnaire, a 12-item general self-efficacyscale, an 8-item academic self-efficacy, and an 11-item self-efficacy for selfregulatedlearning. Data were analyzed through multiple regression analyses. Results indicated that musical and linguistic intelligences were predictors ofgeneral self-efficacy and spatial /visual intelligence made a significantcontribution to predicting self-efficacy for self-regulated learning whileacademic self-efficacy could not be predicted by any of the intelligencetypes.