Perhaps Durkheim first introduced SOCIAL COHESION into sociology. He concluded the concept of SOCIAL COHESION from division of labor in SOCIAL system. Durkheim has formulated a particular analytical and conceptual system whose four sides are as follows: SOCIAL division of labor, collective conscience, SOCIAL COHESION, and law rights.On the other hand, the Holy Quran which takes care of SOCIAL COHESION chooses another point of departure for advancing its theory in this respect based on natural and genetic foundations instead of being based on shaking conventional ones. The Holy Qur’an believes that the most fundamental factor contributing to [SOCIAL] COHESION is divine religion which has natural and genetic origin. Furthermore, the Holy Qur’an mentions other SOCIAL and genetic components such as family and kinship relationships although none of these SOCIAL factors can be compared with the submission to Islam and belief in the One God. Using an analytical-descriptive approach, the present paper seeks to explore the concept of SOCIAL COHESION in the Holy Quran.

The process of formation of sports action during the historical process as a SOCIAL reality of sports epidemic in the structure of different institutions of any society has become a powerful SOCIAL and cultural realist institution that plays a role in various SOCIAL, cultural, economic and political issues. It plays an outstanding role in different geographically SOCIALized environments, and individuals, whether formally or informally, form different groups to compete on the field. As well as being considered and considered as a SOCIAL phenomenon, sport has taken a prominent place in various local, national and global levels. Formation of boards, associations, institutions, unions and main and sub-committees in the SOCIAL system that deal with the issue of sports, whether cognitive or behavioral, in order to support sports activities, at the local, national and global levels, and in Formal and informal, in order to converge, local and national COHESION work both at the level of small groups and at the level of large groups, among which intra-group and extra-group COHESION are very important in advancing the goals of the SOCIAL system and Culture is a sport.

The particular character of SOCIAL COHESION is its collective nature which solidarity is the guarantor of their unity. For this reason, forms of correlation depend on different kinds of community. In different circumstances, COHESION is determined by external variables. This research evaluates the virtual SOCIAL networks.The method is documentary and survey and statistical population consists of 15000 Payam-e Noor University students in Ardabil. To obtain the sample, Cochran formula is used. The sample size is 250 people. The unit of analysis in this study is individual. In this study, disproportionate stratified cluster sampling method is used. The findings of this study indicate that the correlation between student SOCIAL COHESION who use SOCIAL networks is significant and t=-2.003. The exchange of information without censorship hypothesis is confirmed with 0.279 coefficients. In the use of SOCIAL networks hypothesis correlation with 0.306 is confirmed. The cultural interaction hypothesis is confirmed by correlation 0.322. In hypothesis two groups of users of SOCIAL networks no significant differences are observed between their SOCIAL COHESION. The hypothesis of SOCIAL and cultural interaction with the characters, there is no significant difference. There is no significant difference in students' interactions inside and outside the country.

In contemporary multicultural Britain, the concept of SOCIAL COHESION has been a pressing priority for not only politicians and sociologists but also for the various British ethnic minorities. Race riots like those of 2001 in Northern Britain and the events of 7/7 in London (2005) put into question the allegiances of different British ethnic populations. They equally shed light on the real or perceived lack of SOCIAL and cultural communication between the established British host population and the British ethnic and immigrant communities. Hence, SOCIAL COHESION came to the fore as the new jargon of governance in contemporary Britain. This article analyzes on the concept of SOCIAL COHESION and its applicability within an officially declared multicultural community like that of Great Britain. The concept will be reviewed, defined and approached from different liberal political perspectives while paying special attention to the British context. Bhikhu Parekh’ s conception of the different theoretical approaches to the issue of SOCIAL COHESION that are pertinent to liberal capitalist societies in general and the British context, in particular, is investigated. The aim of this study is to highlight the complexity of the normative accounts of the political scientists regarding the challenges that face multicultural Britain in coming to terms with its endeavor of creating “ unity within diversity” . The 2002 White Paper and security speech of David Cameron (2011) political discourses are analyzed and evaluated to decipher how they understood national identity in relation to cultural diversity and SOCIAL COHESION.

Any SOCIAL system require a quiet atmosphere away from any conflict and tension for its stability and dynamics to be able to achieve its goals. The major areas that require progress is impossible without them. One of its fields is national unity and SOCIAL COHESION in society. So now, all political systems in the world strive to achieve convergence and consolidation in their communities with the correct understanding of this fact. We believe that Mahdavi government and society will also excel human societies in this virtue and is creating the SOCIAL COHESION among societies is one of the strategies after the emergence of Imam. To reach this consensus, he will work the methods and strategies and a model for communities that can be worthy for the societies who want to have a converging nation. Solutions such as spreading a unified worldview and religion and multidimensional development of SOCIAL justice, development of kindness, promoting intellectual and cultural level of society with this strategies and of course with a systematic and inspirational leadership can be models to follow for the government and society that sets the scene for emergence; This hold for both trying to fulfil conditions and contexts of the emergence of the saviour and for improving the status and the organization of the existing SOCIAL system.