Research background There are several writings about Mollanasreddin’, s jokes. These writings have been proposed and published for different age groups and with different views according to the nature of Mollanasreddin’, s speech. On the other hand, according to the popularity of Mollanasreddin’, s jokes, we can observe the presence of his stories and speeches among the public, which means that they are orally transmitted. One of the most important works in which Mollanasreddin’, s jokes has been mentioned is in the following study entitled "Investigation of the discourse of power in the language of Mollanasreddin’, s language" by Gholami Shilsir. As it is clear from the title, the view of Michel Foucault's discourse, which is essentially considered as a philosophical view, is observed in this study. In this research, the author has examined the discourse of power and their satire by Mollanasreddin, and investigates how Mollanasreddin dialectically satires the discourses of power (Religious, governmental, capitalist) in the text of his narratives. In another research, entitled "How to write a comic with an emphasis on Mollanasreddin’, s jokes" (Mollazadeh, 2011), the researcher has followed the method of comedy writing to identify the weakness of comedy texts, especially the Iranian classical texts,he has selected his examples from the heart of Mollanasreddin’, s jokes. What can be discussed from this research as a conclusion is that the existence of different geographical languages and cultures which causes a joke to be accompanied by laughter in a geography and culture, and the same joke in other cultures and nations, do not associated with no laughter. One of the other resources in line with the title of this research include a book, Jokes from the culture of the Iranian people (Sugar and SALT shaker) (Jafari Ghanavati, 2012) the subject of which is about collecting a series of jokes that have been recorded directly from the language of people in different parts of Iran, and many of these jokes have been quoted by writers of Persian literature in their works. In this book, special attention is paid to the character of Mollanasreddin as one of the jokers of Persian literature. In the book Etymology of Mollanasreddin’, s personality (Salar Abdi, 2013), we often see the study of Mollanasreddin’, s personality, and in the book of Johi (Mojahed, 2004), some of his jokes has been mentioned. Objectives and questions As it was mentioned, Mollanasreddin is one of the most humorous Iranian characters. The joke is full of surprise and laughter. The great theorists in the world of humor have introduced the basic foundations as well as the expression of the main subject of the joke. This research considering a literary and theatrical view, seeks to be able to provide a solution for the best use of jokes in the discussion of the play to evaluate the jokes of Mollanasreddin based on Melvin Helitzers’, s theory, which is one of the theorists of humor, suggesting six comics (target, hostility, realism, exaggeration, excitement, and surprise) (Helitzers, 2001). Now, according to this theory, this study is looking for an appropriate answer to his question: do the theories mentioned on behalf of Helitzers are adaptable with Mollanasreddin’, s jokes? ", in order to evaluate Mollanasreddin’, s jokes. To this aim, the researcher has randomly selected his samples from Mollanasreddin’, s jokes and then has applied the descriptive and analytical methods for their analysis. Discussion The jokes of Mollanasreddin are a rich collection for their existential structure. Moreover, the multitude of books and discussions about the theories of laughter and comedy and the ideas which are offered about satire and comedy writing, seem to be confusing. However, one can refer to Helitzers (1924-2009) professor of communications, journalism, and satirist at the University of Ohio, for clarification. This study has examined six elements of comic suggested by Melvin Helitzers in Mollanasreddin’, s jokes. First, each of the six elements were investigated individually and their categories were found in the jokes of Mollanasreddin. Finally, all six elements in a joke were collectively investigated so that the subject can be evaluated carefully. It should be noted that each of the six elements appear in different forms. Conclusion This study showed that most of these jokes have six comic elements of Melvin Helitzers' categories and it is possible to make a comparison between these six comic elements and Mollanasreddin’, s jokes. In the main jokes of Mollanasreddin, we see the presence of realism in two types (The presence of Mollanasreddin’, s name in the jokes and Mollanasreddin's relations with people). Exaggeration is often formed about an element of this realist world. Despite the fact that the audience knows that he/she is facing Mollanasreddin who never underestimates anything, always has an answer for everything, and has a high level of intelligence, he does not consider any red line or demarcation for himself/herself, and ultimately creates excitement. In the jokes of Mollanasreddin, the audience is often located in a situation where they are eagerly waiting to see what is going to happen,these situations spontaneously have very high excitement and eventually a surprise end. What is clear here is that the richness of these jokes and the completeness of their various aspects are quite suitable for moving towards their application in the form of comic shows and accordingly, its dramatic adaptation can be done in various ways. Although the six elements can be seen in Mollanasreddin’, s jokes, it should also be noted that recognizing the disadvantage of each of the six key elements within the text can be a great help to correct the disadvantage and rewrite the text and strengthen of it which all of these subjects depends on getting a better understanding of the six elements.