Introduction: Personal health record is an individual -oriented system that is planned for people to access their health information that using other means of support such as knowledge databases to help people to have more active role in their health Considering that physicians and nurses have a basic role in its completing, educating and using of this tools, this study was conducted to evaluate the VIEW POINT of physicians and nurses in this regard.Methods: In this descriptive – cross-sectional study, 120 and 250 randomly selected physicians and nurses from affiliated hospitals of Kashan University of Medical Sciences were studied in 2008.Data collected using a reliable (spearman Brown, r=0.82) and valid (face and content) questionnaire in two section; demographic information (age, sex, education and income levels) and objective questions in the form of yes - no and choice question. Obtained data analyzed using SPSS software and descriptive statistics.Results: 93.8% of participants believed on the necessity of personal health record and 88.6% on the existence of a coherent format. The most important use was providing information for health care providers (%58.1) and portable storage was the best form of it (%39.2). The most benefits of personal health record were knowledge of patients about their apPOINTment (85.7%) and the most disadvantage was misunderstand of the information (67.6%). The most cause of lack of providing personal health record was unawareness about its advantages (49.7%).Conclusion: Personal health record from VIEWPOINT of physicians and nurses is necessary and problems and concerns about patient misunderstanding, privacy and security should be eliminated as appropriate. It is recommended that the personal health record provide by the authorities of Ministry of Health and Medical Education with cooperating with private section and insurance organizations.

With the advent of modernism in Iran, Iranian researchers endeavored to find some answers for Iranian trend and closure to the achievement and modern attempts. Sometimes this phenomenon is studied from the sociology VIEW POINT which is done sometimes through the political wittings or Ideological perspective and religious credos. This issue rarely studied from philosophical VIEW POINT. In the article we aimed at reVIEWing this issue from Dariush Shayegan’s VIEW POINT. Shayegan endeavored to separate the philosophy of west form Asian civilization. To him, Asian mystical beliefs are based on pieties and inspiration. But western philosophy related to secularism, materialism and all the realm of sciences.

Reading Quran for the Muslem has the specified position and the Quran "s follower do thier best for his protection and publishing. Regarding to koofi scription and different accent in Arab people related with reading its holy words, since the first days of Islam expanding caused to happen some opposition between Muslem. Dispite of the caliphs"s effort especially Osmun, the people disablities in learning and reading Quran as it was discending and also their intresting caused to different reading. Since a century of discending Quran the reading readers who were familiar with the knowledge of reading taught their experiencs, but that was not classified. The other groups in the name of reading"s narrator who became famous, attempted to registor, publish and classify the reader"s reading. After passing of time and publishing of reading knowledge and nominating the number of readers by Quran researchers especially its reader such as Ebn Mojahed its discussing, rejecting and confirming became important.

Ibn Sina in most of his logical works has added the stipulation "remaining of falsity" to the definition of conversion, a stipulation that has been repeated in the logical works of thinkers such as Fakhr Razi and Abhari; but most logicians has challenged this procedure. For example, Khajeh Nasir Tusi believes that the above - mentioned stipulation has been generated by the scribe's mistakes.In this article by emphasis on the existence of abovementioned stipulation in six logical writings of Ibn Sina it is shown that this stipulation cannot be ascribed to the scribe's mistakes. By proposing and evaluating the opposing and favorable reasons of this stipulation it will be evident that the acceptance of above - mentioned stipulation brings about inconsistency in the logical system of Ibn Sina. Within this article two solutions have been proposed for resolving this problem. The first solution which has been formed on the basis of elimination of above mentioned stipulation has been offered by khajenh Nasir and other logicians in later times, and the other solution which deals with the changing relation of conversion has been proposed by the writers of this article. It has also been shown that each of these two solutions has its own privileges and defects.

Paul Simpson is one of the researchers who have worked in the field of stylistics and critical linguistics. One of the topics which he has studied systematically is the “POINT of VIEW.” In his opinion, POINT of VIEW is related to the degree of narrator’s interference in the act of narration. It has three dimensions: (1) spatial; (2) temporal; and (3) psychological. The writer or narrator unites these items through modality. Furthermore, focusing on modality, Simpson introduces his narrative model which includes nine different POINTs of VIEW. In this model, he incorporates Genet’s discussion on four POINTs of VIEW and also the model of Uspensky and Fowler. Simpson believes that by studying the three spatial, temporal, and psychological dimensions of the POINT of VIEW, we can reach at its ideological dimension.

Idea, the principal term in Spinoza’s epistemology, is an indirect mode for the attribute of thought. Idea is a primary, active, and judgmental constituent of the human soul. Different kinds of idea entail: imagination, reasoning, and intuition. Having the same meaning, truth and adequacy are the criteria of its validity. Correspondence is an extrinsic mark of the truth of idea and explanation, whereas, evidence, clearness, and distinctness are the intrinsic marks of the adequacy of the idea. According to Spinoza, knowledge is divided to two kinds, complete knowledge and incomplete knowledge, the common feature of which is "justified belief". So knowledge is a belief (an idea with judgment) which has a justification (causal explanation or sensory evidence). Therefore, imagination, reasoning, and intuition are from the category of knowledge, however, only the second and the third are regarded as complete knowledge.

According to the Sufis the relation between God and the world is similar to the relation between sun and its rays so all prophets came from a single source of light; however lay people who have engaged in material matters could not appreciate this unity, therefore, called the prophets as Moses, Jesus and etc.Since people could not realize the essence of religion, they start interpreting it according to their understanding, and as a result, fighting with each other.Rumi believes that prophets are the representatives of God on the earth and by using allegory he tries to explain the unity of the path of prophets. According to Rumi, the mystery of the oneness of religion will be discovered only by cutting through the exoteric side of it. From his VIEWPOINT the innate God-given religion, or the real divine unity, and the devotional prayer are the essence of religion and if people understand this reality, their conflict will be disappeared.

This article is an attempt to conceptualize and evaluate the contributions of the idea of dialogue of civilizations to the constructivist theory of international relations. The first, introductory part of the article deals with the concept of dialogue of civilizations and shows how it is in contrast with the mainstream realist perception of international politics in various aspects. It is argued that constructivism with its emphasis on ontological aspects of international relations, the constructed-ness of international reality, and the transformability of international relations paves the way for introducing moral, normative, and value-based arguments emphasized in this idea. In the second part of the article constructivism and its main arguments will be examined. The third part will be dedicated to the contributions of the notion of dialogue of civilizations to constructivism on the basis of theoretical and meta-theoretical themes discussed in constructivism. The main themes include international actors and their identities, the constructed-ness of identity, the impact of ideational factors thereon, and the possibilities for change in actors' identity and hence in the international inter-subjective structures.

When expounding on ethnic problems in Iran, the relations between the members of the ethnic groups and those of the larger community are often neglected and the role of processes and big structures and misuse of ethnic differences by foreign forces and elite groups are highlighted. The present study attempts to understand the ethnic relations from the POINT of VIEW of people's every day experiences, and the mechanisms by which the social identities and ethnic boundaries are developed in the relations between "self' and "others" and in light of power relations.To achieve this, the writer overVIEWs and criticizes the existing general perspectives and propounds an alternative perspective that combines the "relational" and "constructivist" approaches to ethnic relations. On the basis of this analysis, Iran will continue to have ethnic diversity, while ethnic differences can, under particular circumstances, lead to mobilization of group sentiments and construction of divergent identities. Awareness of such circumstances and factors that elicit tension in ethnic relations in Iran can help policymakers to come up with better and more effective policies.

Mowlavi is a theoretician poet in Persian literature whose worksespecially Koliat-e-Shams and Massnavi- are enriched with critical VIEWs. In this paper Mowlavi's linguistic and literary VIEWs are discussed. This research was carried out by relying on contemporary literary criticism theories, particularly Roman Jakobson's Theory of Communication. The analysis of the major elements of communication, meaning the language's features and characteristics, message (poetry), sender (poet) and receiver (addressee) in Mowlavi's poetry construct the basis axis of this paper while each of these elements is divided into smaller components. In order to identify the position of Mowlavi's theories in the contemporary era, his standPOINTs have been compared with some other schools and literary criticism theories in brief. Among them the most prominent ones include; new criticism, formalisms, structuralisms, and supporters of reader-response theories. The capable reader versus the novice reader, active and inactive, concrete union, cohesion of poetry's form and content, relation between mind and language, link between signified and signifier, language codes etc are among the common discussions of the mentioned schools with Mowlavi's ideas.