Cancer is an important health and hygienic issue in the world. The usage of medicinal plants as a natural source of cancer treatment is considered because of the lack of toxicity of these plants, in most cases on normal cells. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ethanolic extract of Urginea maritima root on Hela cancer cells compared to Hek normal cells. After root drying, extraction was done by Soxhlet method. Then, Hela and Hek cells were cultured at concentrations of 1000, 200, 150, 100, 50, 10, 1 and 0. 1 μ g/ml of ethanolic extract of Urginea maritima root at 24, 48, 72 hours and their viability was determined by MTT test. Ethanolic extract of Urginea maritima root decreased the viability of Hela cells at different doses and hours (P<0. 05) but it didn’ t effect on Hek cells viability. Discussion: Due to existence of flavonoids and glycosides in the Urginea maritima root, the reduction of Hela cells viability can be attributed to these compounds.

Background: Although there are improvements in breast cancer diagnosis and treatment methods, some breast tumor cells still are resistant to current therapies. Thus, there are attempts all over the world to find an effective way with more toxicity to tumor cells and less to normal cells. In recent years, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), due to their native tumor homing PROPERTY, have been introduced as expression vectors for ANTICANCER proteins, such as TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). However, most tumor cells are resistant to TRAIL or show low sensitivity to it. Thus, it is necessary to find a way to increase the sensitivity of cancer cells and decrease their resistance. One of these ways is combination therapy with herbal drugs. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the combination of sub-toxic doses of aqueous extract of Berberis vulgaris (AEBV) and MSC-TRAIL on MCF-7 cells as a human breast cancer cell line. Methods: Experiments were set based on in vitro cell culture. Combination therapy was carried out in transwell co-culture plates. The cell viability was determined by theMTT assay. The cell cycle was measured using the Propidium Iodide (PI) staining flow cytometry method. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA test using SPSS software. Results: MCF-7 cells were relatively resistant to MSC-TRAIL and AEBV alone, while a sub-toxic concentration of AEBV (0. 5 mg/mL) combined with MSC-TRAIL significantly increased death in MCF-7 cells, showing a synergistic effect.

The previous part of this essay discussed the decree for possessing a found PROPERTY. Here in this part, the author reviews three topics: giving charity, safekeeping a PROPERTY, and handing over a found PROPERTY to the legal ruler. To elaborate each topic, he discusses evidences mentioned in Quran and Tradition and examines their authenticity in comparison to the ones of derelict PROPERTY. At the end, the decrees of a derelict PROPERTY and the fact of handing it over to the legal ruler are discussed.

The essay focuses on taking possession of the "Found PROPERTY". The author first presents four types of narrations that indicate taking possession of the Found PROPERTY, and then discusses their possible interpretations. He, then, mentions three ways to solve the paradoxes that lie in those narrations, and reviews the cases in which one can or should give the Found PROPERTY as charity. He believes the Found Animal and the Found PROPERTY in Masjid -Al- Haram are exceptions and one cannot take possession of them. Finally, he finds the relation between narrations which suggest taking possession of the Found PROPERTY or giving it as charity and those which highlight that some Found Properties cannot be possessed.

Right of private PROPERTY is the most important individual rights of society in the heart of private law. In Islamic law protection of PROPERTY as one of the five goals of fighhe, that is, protection of sagacity, religion, generation and self, is to be stipulated. Based on article 140 of civil code, the process of PROPERTY acquisition is restricted to four cases. On the other hand, legislator has limited the causes of PROPERTY acquisition to four cases and prohibited any other acquisition out of these causes. The purpose of present article is investigating the process of PROPERTY acquisition of intellectual works in the light of article 140 of civil code. However, at first, the value of intellectual works will be analyzed since it is the introduction of PROPERTY acquisition of intellectual works and the quality of private PROPERTY acquisition of intellectual works to its creator will be separately investigated afterward.

Shofeh in jurisprudence and article 808 means the right of each of the copartner in obtaining the partnership in case of exchange of exchange with his copartner for the payment of the price. Shofeh is current in immovable PROPERTY that cannot be divided, and there is a difference between jurists in movable and immovable PROPERTY that cannot be divided. This research has been done in a descriptive-analytical way and seeks to answer questions such as: "What is the jurisprudential basis of the right of Shofeh in cases of movable and immovable PROPERTY that cannot be divided? " and so on. Regarding the background of the research, it should be said that several research studies include: the conditions for obtaining intercession in the subject law of Iran and Imami jurisprudence from Fakhreddin Asghari, the principles Shofeh on jurisprudence in movable PROPERTY from the perspective of Islamic religions from Morteza Rahimi, omparative study Shofeh in Sunni jurisprudence And the rights of Iran have been exercised by Sadegh Soltanpour, etc. But the difference between the present study and the mentioned cases in proving the right of shofeh in over transferable PROPERTY and Non-transferable PROPERTY Indivisible based on jurisprudential reasons, while that research, looking for proving the lack of right of shofeh in over transferable PROPERTY and Non-transferable PROPERTY Indivisible. The result is that obtaining Shofeh in movable and immovable, PROPERTY that is indivisible in the four reasons of jurisprudence (books, traditions, consensus and reason) is fixed