video

sound

Persian Version

View:

1,582

Download:

0

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

NATIONAL SECURITY AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED; A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRIAL PROCEDURE AGAINST TERRORIST ACTIONS

Author(s)

 AALIPOUR HASAN

Pages

  5-44

Abstract

 The close relationship between the criminal law and NATIONAL SECURITY in fight against terrorism has produced a mixed picture of criminal law by which although the relevant regulations are preventing governments from interfering in individual rights and freedoms, however they provide a pretext for justification of their authoritative and limitative actions in favor of NATIONAL SECURITY.In this way, due to some characteristics of terrorist groups like dangerousness, organization, biasness and un-modifiability, anti– terrorist laws consist of some tough regulations regarding terrorists which are finally affecting freedom and rights of the ordinary citizens.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    AALIPOUR, HASAN. (2009). NATIONAL SECURITY AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED; A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRIAL PROCEDURE AGAINST TERRORIST ACTIONS. STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY, 12(1 (43)), 5-44. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/92779/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AALIPOUR HASAN. NATIONAL SECURITY AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED; A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRIAL PROCEDURE AGAINST TERRORIST ACTIONS. STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY[Internet]. 2009;12(1 (43)):5-44. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/92779/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HASAN AALIPOUR, “NATIONAL SECURITY AND RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED; A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TRIAL PROCEDURE AGAINST TERRORIST ACTIONS,” STRATEGIC STUDIES QUARTERLY, vol. 12, no. 1 (43), pp. 5–44, 2009, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/92779/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops