video

sound

Persian Version

View:

16,823

Download:

11,087

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF APACHE II AND SAPS II SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT’S OUTCOME

Pages

  0-0

Keywords

VALIDATION STUDIES [PUBLICATION TYPE] 

Abstract

 Introduction: Using physiologic scoring systems for identifying high-risk patients for mortalityhas been considered recently. This study was designed to evaluate the values of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II)and Simplified Acute Physiologic Score (SAPS II) models in prediction of 1-month mortality of critically ill patients. Methods: The present prospective cross sectional study was performed on critically ill patients presented to emergency department during 6 months. Data required for calculation of the scores were gathered and performance of the models in prediction of 1-month mortalitywere assessed using STATA software 11.0. Results: 82 critically ill patients with the mean age of 53.45 § 20.37 years were included (65.9%male). Their mortality rate was 48%. Mean SAPS II (p < 0.0001) and APACHE II (p = 0.0007) scores were significantly higher in dead patients. Area under the ROC curve of SAPS II and APACHE II for prediction of mortality were 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64-0.86) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.60-0.83), respectively (p = 0.24). The slope and intercept of SAPS II were 1.02 and 0.04, respectively. In addition, these values were 0.92 and 0.09 for APACHE II, respectively. Conclusion: The findings of the present study showed that APACHE II and SAPS II had similar value in predicting 1-month mortality of patients. Discriminatory powers of thementionedmodels were acceptable but their calibration had some amount of lack of fit, which reveals that APACHE II and SAPS II are partially perfect.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    AMINIAHIDASHTI, H., & BOZORGI, F., & MONTAZER, S., & Baboli, M., & FIROUZIAN, A. (2017). COMPARISON OF APACHE II AND SAPS II SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT’S OUTCOME. ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (EMERGENCY), 5(1), 0-0. https://sid.ir/paper/339722/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AMINIAHIDASHTI HAMED, BOZORGI FARZAD, MONTAZER SEYYED HOSEIN, Baboli Majid, FIROUZIAN ABOLFAZL. COMPARISON OF APACHE II AND SAPS II SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT’S OUTCOME. ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (EMERGENCY). 2017 [cited 2023January30];5(1):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/339722/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AMINIAHIDASHTI, H., BOZORGI, F., MONTAZER, S., Baboli, M., FIROUZIAN, A., 2017. COMPARISON OF APACHE II AND SAPS II SCORING SYSTEMS IN PREDICTION OF CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT’S OUTCOME. ARCHIVES OF ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE (EMERGENCY), [online] 5(1), pp.0-0. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/339722/en.