COMPARISON BETWEEN GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHODS FOR DAILY RIVER FLOW FORECASTING (CASE STUDY: BARANDOOZCHAY RIVER)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AHMADI F.; RADMANESH F.; MIRABBASI NAJAF ABADI R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Water and Soil Year:2015 | Volume:28 | Issue:6 Page(s): 1162-1171

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

863

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON BETWEEN GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHODS FOR DAILY RIVER FLOW FORECASTING (CASE STUDY: BARANDOOZCHAY RIVER)

Author(s)

AHMADI F. | RADMANESH F. | MIRABBASI NAJAF ABADI R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GENETIC PROGRAMMING (GP)Q2

SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE (SVM)Q2

DAILY DISCHARGE FORECASTINGQ1

BARANDOOZCHAY RIVERQ2

Abstract

Accurate estimation of river flow can have a significant importance in water resources management. In this study, Genetic programming (GP) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) methods were used to forecast daily discharge of Baran doozchay River. The daily discharge data of Baran doozchay River measured at the Dizaj hydrometric station during 2007 to 2011 was used for modeling, which 80% of the data used for training and remaining 20% used for testing of models. The results showed that in the both of considered methods, the models including discharges of one, two and three days ago had higher accuracy in verification step and the accuracy of models decreased with increasing discharge values. Comparing the performance of GP and SVM methods indicated that, however the accuracy of the GP method with the R=0.978 and RMSE=1.66 (m3/s) wasslightly more than SVM method with R=0.976 and RMSE=1.80 (m3/s), but the SVM is easier than GP method. Thus, the SVM method can be used as an alternative method in forecasting daily river discharge.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AHMADI, F., RADMANESH, F., & MIRABBASI NAJAF ABADI, R.. (2015). COMPARISON BETWEEN GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHODS FOR DAILY RIVER FLOW FORECASTING (CASE STUDY: BARANDOOZCHAY RIVER). JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), 28(6), 1162-1171. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/141189/en

Vancouver: Copy

AHMADI F., RADMANESH F., MIRABBASI NAJAF ABADI R.. COMPARISON BETWEEN GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHODS FOR DAILY RIVER FLOW FORECASTING (CASE STUDY: BARANDOOZCHAY RIVER). JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY)[Internet]. 2015;28(6):1162-1171. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/141189/en

IEEE: Copy

F. AHMADI, F. RADMANESH, and R. MIRABBASI NAJAF ABADI, “COMPARISON BETWEEN GENETIC PROGRAMMING AND SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE METHODS FOR DAILY RIVER FLOW FORECASTING (CASE STUDY: BARANDOOZCHAY RIVER),” JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL (AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY), vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1162–1171, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/141189/en

Related Journal Papers