Paper Information

Title: 

COULD IT BE POSSIBLE TO APPLY IIEF–15 QUESTIONNAIRE IN ERECTION DISORDER'S ETIOLOGY SPECIFICATION?

Type: PAPER
Author(s): MEHRABAN DARAB,BINIAZ FARZAD,NADERI GH.H.,SHABANINIA SH.*,REZAEI MOHSEN,RANDJBARI MOHAMMAD
 
 *
 
Name of Seminar: CONGREH ANJOMAN UROLOGY IRAN
Type of Seminar:  CONGRESS
Sponsor:  ANJOMAN OROLOGY
Date:  2005Volume 8
 
 
Abstract: 

INTRODUCTION: THESE DAYS, SEXUAL HEALTH CONDITION‘S QUESTIONNAIRE HAS AN IMPORTANT ROLE IN PHARMACEUTICAL REVIEW AND THEIR EFFECTS SPECIFICATION. AS THESE QUESTIONNAIRES ARE SIMPLE AND CHEAP, THEIR SUBSTITUTION PROBABILITY, INSTEAD OF WIDE AND EXPENSIVE RESEARCH IN THE ED, WOULD BE CONSIDERABLE.
MATERIALS & APPROACHES:
28 PATIENTS WITH 34 YEARS IN AVERAGE (23-46), THAT WERE RECOGNIZED WITH ED, CONSIDERED UNDER DUPLEX DUPPLER BY (POPAVERIN) * INJECTION INTO THEIR
(COVER NOSAL) * AND PREVIOUSLY, THEIR ED’S RATE WERE EVALUATED, WERE CONSIDERED DURING 2001, THE VENOUS DISORDER WITH (RI<0.9) AND ARTERIAL DISORDER WITH PSV<25 CM/S AND MIXED DISORDER BESIDES THE EXISTENCE OF BOTH TWO ABOVE MENTIONED PARAMETERS WERE DIAGNOSED AND THE STATISTIC REVIEW WITH (WILCOXON TEST) WERE DONE.
RESULTS: 16 PATIENTS (57%) WITHOUT VASCULAR DISORDER, AND 12 PATIENTS (43%) WITH VASCULAR DISORDER, THAT 9 PERSONS (32%) OF THEM, HAD VENUES DISORDER. THERE WERE SPECIFIC DISTINCTION AMONG PERSONS WHO HAD ERECTION BEHAVIOR TESTS (TOTAL QUESTIONS 1-5 & 15) AND THE OTHER GROUP THAT HAD THE ERECTION MAINTENANCE TEST (QUESTIONS 4+5) AND AMONG THE PERSONS WHO HAD VASCULAR DISORDER AND WITHOUT IT (P=0.04 & P<0.02).
AMONG THE OTHER DIFFERENT GROUPS QUESTIONNAIRE EVALUATION WITH ETIOLOGY OF ERECTION DISORDER ANY RELATIONS WERE NOT SEEN.
ALSO THE RATE OF AMOUNT – CHANGE OF THE PENIS VEIN BY (POPAVERIN) * INJECTION, DIDN’T HAVE ANY DIFFERENCE AMONG THE DIFFERENT ETIOLOGIES; BUT, BETWEEN IIEF- 15 TOTAL SCORE OF VASCULAR DISORDER AND WITHOUT OF IT, FOR BOTH TWO GROUPS THERE WERE BORDERING DIFFERENCE (P=0.060, 41.37+/- 13, 36.5+/ - 8.7, BY CONSIDERING VENUES DISORDER GROUP (36.2+/- 8.7) THIS DIFFERENCE WOULD BE SPECIFIC (P=0.038) BETWEEN PSV & RI AMONG THOSE TWO GROUP THERE WAS A SPECIFIC DIFFERENCE (P=0.005, P=0.04).
RESULTING AND DISCUSSION: IN ED PROBABLE SPECIFICATION THE IIEH-15 QUESTIONNAIRE COULD BE APPLIED, IIEH TOTAL SCORE AND SPECIALLY THE SCORE OF ERECTION BEHAVIOR PART (TOTAL QUESTIONS 1-5 & 15) AND ERECTION MAINTENANCE (QUESTIONS 4+5) OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE COULD BE USED AS A PROOF FOR EXISTENCE OF THE VASCULAR DISORDER, THAT NEEDED A WIDER AND MORE EXPENSIVE CONSIDERATION.

 
Keyword(s): ERECTION DISORDER, QUESTIONNAIRE, VASCULAR ERECTION DISORDER, (DUPLEX SONOGRAPHY)
 
Yearly Visit 40   tarjomyar
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog