| Abstract:
Abstract: There are many researches and assumptions about the family's dependence and dependence during the first Achaemenid period. In the Oriental historiography, sometimes a legendary and mythic texture, the recognition of the descendants and descendants and the dependence of the hero-kings family, which was raised to the level of the divinity in a relative way, does not seem to be very convenient. The question of this study is that the transfer of power from the Medes to the Persians, and then at the beginning of this series, to the extent that the transfer of power to the other branch of the Achaemenid dynasty has been effective in the validity of the proposed assignments? The research hypothesis is based on the fact that one of the oldest attributions of the founder of a new kingdom is to the Achaemenid dynasty of the preceding rulers in Iranian history, and in the first period of the rulers of this dynasty they talked about the transfer of power to other branches of this The family is well-known, many studies have taken place in history that have a formal and imitative image and are more closely aligned with the traditions of Greek historians such as Herodotus. The result of this research shows that with a little analysis and interpretation of historical developments and phenomena, especially with regard to its eastern and mythological context, the issue of descent and assignment in the first Achaemenid period was also to be interpreted and analyzed in other ways.
|