| Abstract:
Reply;
We thank Joob et al1 for their interest in the recent report published in Archives of Iranian Medicine. They nicely urge that the peer review process is an undeniable step in the scientific publishing worldwide. In agreement with Joob et al, we think that the current approach used by thousands of journals is not sufficiently accurate and free of bias. The rationale for our recent publication is about lack of attention by editors in choosing the scientific reviewers. Shaping the current process into a better approach can guarantee that certain authors cannot compromise the review process...
|