Paper Information

Journal:   MEDICAL FIGH QUARTERLY   FALL 2015-WINTER 2016 , Volume 7 , Number 24-25; Page(s) 37 To 66.
 
Paper: 

LEGITIMACY OF HANGING WITHOUT TORMENT AND WITH VARIOUS OVERCAST, IMPRISON, RETALIATORY AND GOVERNMENTAL TYPES

 
 
Author(s):  GHODRATI FATEMEH*
 
* 
 
Abstract: 

Nowadays culprits execute simply and gently by omitting torment in hanging punishment. Especially this action can be done by new surgical technology and medical science developments aided in order to execute painless death completely. In this branch legal usage of this method and even medical cadre as death officers is always proposed in legal discussion.
In Islam law, based on different nature of all kinds of prescribed death, retaliation, discretionary and administration hangings also proofs on judge’s powers bounds concerning retaliation and prescribed punishment and specific stipulations for determining death methods in some crimes, legitimacy of enjoying modern methods in prescribed and retaliation death is doubtful. In The governmental and prescribed death, painless legitimacy faces with question due to difference of opinions.
This research is made by an analytical-descriptive method and by the use of various library resources. Upon revising the primary order and re-studying of narrations about subjects or methods of hanging and necessity of torment for it, the present study has concerned torment-free methods due to the order of governor and rejecting any common and legal methods. Regarding the secondary order again selection of pain-free methods are preferred when painful methods of hanging have further negative reflects in society and even world attitudes.

 
Keyword(s): OVERCAST HANGING, IMPRISON HANGING, GOVERNMENTAL HANGING, RETALIATORY HANGING, HANGING WITHOUT TORMENT
 
References: 
  • ندارد
 
  Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 37
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog