Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   ACTA MEDICA IRANICA   2014 , Volume 52 , Number 8; Page(s) 0 To 0.
 
Paper: 

EVALUATION SYSTEMS FOR CLINICAL GOVERNANCE DEVELOPMENT: A COMPARATIVE STUDY

 
 
Author(s):  HOOSHMAND ELAHEH, TOURANI SOGAND*, RAVAGHI HAMID, EBRAHIMIPOUR HOSSEIN
 
* DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES MANAGEMENT, IRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, TEHRAN, IRAN
 
Abstract: 

Lack of scientific and confirmed researches and expert knowledge about evaluation systems for clinical governance development in Iran have made studies on different Evaluation Systems for Clinical Governance Development anecessity. These studies must provide applied strategies to design criteria of implementing Clinical Governance for Hospital's Accreditation. This is a descriptive and comparative study on Development of Clinical Governance Models all over the world. Data have been gathered by reviewing related articles. Models have been studied in Comprehensive Review Method. The evaluated Models of Clinical Governance Development were Australian, NHS, SPOCK and OPTIGOV. The Final aspects extracted from these models were Responsiveness, Policies and Strategies, Organizational Structure, Allocating Resources, Education and Occupational Development, Performance Evaluation, External Evaluation, Patient Oriented Approach, Risk Management, Personnel's Participation, Information Technology, Human Resources, Research and Development, Evidence Based Medicine, Clinical Audit, Health Technology Assessment and Quality. These results are applicable for completing the present criteria which evaluating Clinical Governance Application and provide practical framework to evaluate country's Hospital on the basis of Clinical Governance Elements.

 
Keyword(s): EVALUATION, SYSTEM, CLINICAL GOVERNANCE, DEVELOPMENT, COMPARATIVE STUDY
 
References: 
 
  pdf-File tarjomyar Yearly Visit 59
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog