Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT & EVOLUTION MANAGEMENT   SPRING 2011 , Volume 3 , Number 6; Page(s) 57 To 67.
 
Paper: 

COMPARISON OF THE RESULTS OF PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL USING TRADITIONAL METHOD AND 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK: THE RELATIONSHIP WITH EMPLOYEE SATISFACTION IN LORESTAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES

 
 
Author(s):  JAVAHERIZADEH NASSER, MEHRABI JAVAD*, BAZVAND FARHAD
 
* FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT, ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY, QAZVIN BRANCH, QAZVIN, IRAN
 
Abstract: 

This article reports part of the results of a research conducted at Lorestan University of Medical Sciences in 1389. The study aimed at comparing the employee performance appraisal results in terms of current methods and 360-degree feedback and examining their possible relationship with employee satisfaction. Accordingly, based on the nature of research, the sample was taken from four groups: staff (N=113), managers (N=41), subordinates and patients (N=300) and colleagues (N=300). The samples were selected based on random sampling and quota sampling methods. Data were collected through standard questionnaires. The findings indicated that there is a significant difference among the results of performance appraisal by traditional method and 360- degree feedback in the four groups: colleague's appraisal, staff evaluation, self-assessment and manager's appraisal. The performance appraisal by 360-degree feedback method has a greater impact on employee satisfaction.

 
Keyword(s): PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL, 360-DEGREE FEEDBACK, JOB SATISFACTION
 
References: 
  • ندارد
 
  Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 80
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog