Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   WOMEN'S STRATEGIC STUDIES (KETABE ZANAN)   WINTER 2012 , Volume 14 , Number 54; Page(s) 7 To 58.
 
Paper: 

THE SCOPE OF EKPEDIENCE AND JUSTICE WITHIN THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF WOMEN’S RIGHTS AND RELIGIOUS LAWS

 
 
Author(s):  JAZAYERI SEYED HAMID, ASHAYERI MONFARED MOHAMMAD
 
* 
 
Abstract: 

The jurisprudential and judicial contraries that emerge at the time of invention and application of norms and legal rights at individual or social level including women’s right are not from the same root. The typology of this contradiction can be classified into three parts and what relationship they have in the outside is the main query that this article is dealing with focusing on one of the typology from amongst three. It has dealt with the conformal contention and has focused on the expansion of needed and important rulings, based on the interest of rulings that has placed it into a challenging condition and in some other part, in place of needed and urgent rulings it has other compatibility that has met with contradictory situation outside. The place of legal Justice in contradictory rights is another issue that this paper has dealt with.

 
Keyword(s): CONTRADICTORY EVIDENT RULINGS, CONTRADICTORY WOMEN’S RIGHT, THE PRINCIPLE OF NEEDED AND URGENT, THE PRINCIPLE OF JUSTICE
 
References: 
  • ندارد
 
  Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 78
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog