Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES   FALL 2012 , Volume 9 , Number 34; Page(s) 92 To 104.
 
Paper: 

REVIEW OF THE PERPECTIVES OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND CURRICULUM SPECIALISTS TOWARD GOOD CONDITIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF OPTIMAL DECISION MAKING IN DESIGNING HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM

 
 
Author(s):  KARAMI MORTEZA, BAHMAN ABADI SOMAYEH*, ESMAILI AREZOO
 
* DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, FERDOWSI MASHHAD UNIVERSITY, MASHHAD, IRAN
 
Abstract: 

The main coal of this study was Review of faculty and curriculum specialists rather than to Good condition of the structure of decision making in curriculum designing higher education in terms of nine element of curriculum (goals, content, Learning activities, teaching strategies, evaluation, grouping, resources and tools learning, time and space). Statistical Society of research was faculty of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad and curriculum specialists in the country. Sample size of 100 with Stratified random relative sampling was chosen from faculty of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad with using of Morgan table and 30 specialists from six universities in the program curriculum with available sampling method was chosen. The method of this research is descriptive in Survey method. The research instrument was a made questionnaire. The result was showed that The faculty was willing to the semi-centralized decision-making in components of goals, content, evaluation, time and space, and so they was willing to Decentralization of decision-making status in the four components of learning, teaching methods, grouping, learning resources and tools. Mean Scores of curriculum’s specialists opinions was showed that they willing to semi-centralized decision-making statues for component of learning, content, evaluation and time, and so willing to status of decentralization in component of learning active, teaching methods, grouping, learning resources and tools and the space. Also, the result was showed that there was no significant difference between faculty of different college and with different academic rank. But there was significant difference between curriculum specialists and faculty, as the specialists willing to be more decentralization in decision making. It is suggested that should be give more powers to the universities on curriculum design.

 
Keyword(s): HIGHER EDUCATION, CURRICULUM DESIGN, DECISION MAKING, CENTRALIZATION, DECENTRALIZATION, SEMI-CENTRALIZED
 
 
References: 
  • ندارد
  •  
 
Click to Cite.
APA: Copy

KARAMI, M., & BAHMAN ABADI, S., & ESMAILI, A. (2012). REVIEW OF THE PERPECTIVES OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND CURRICULUM SPECIALISTS TOWARD GOOD CONDITIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF OPTIMAL DECISION MAKING IN DESIGNING HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM. CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, 9(34), 92-104. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=272948



Vancouver: Copy

KARAMI MORTEZA, BAHMAN ABADI SOMAYEH, ESMAILI AREZOO. REVIEW OF THE PERPECTIVES OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND CURRICULUM SPECIALISTS TOWARD GOOD CONDITIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF OPTIMAL DECISION MAKING IN DESIGNING HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM. CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES. 2012 [cited 2021May14];9(34):92-104. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=272948



IEEE: Copy

KARAMI, M., BAHMAN ABADI, S., ESMAILI, A., 2012. REVIEW OF THE PERPECTIVES OF FACULTY MEMBERS AND CURRICULUM SPECIALISTS TOWARD GOOD CONDITIONS OF THE STRUCTURE OF OPTIMAL DECISION MAKING IN DESIGNING HIGHER EDUCATION CURRICULUM. CURRICULUM PLANNING KNOWLEDGE & RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL SCIENCES, [online] 9(34), pp.92-104. Available: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=272948.



 
 
Yearly Visit 53 Persian Abstract
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog