Paper Information

Journal:   REVUE DE RECHERCHE JURIDIQUE   WINTER 2012 , Volume - , Number 56; Page(s) 307 To 332.
 
Paper: 

PROSPECTIVES OF PENAL PANISHMENT OFFENCE (VARIES AT NOMEN CLOTURE) BASED ON IRAN AND EJYPT LAW

 
 
Author(s):  KALANTARI KIUMARS, JAFARIAN SUTE SEIED HASAN
 
* 
 
Abstract: 

The plurality of the actus reus of a crime is one of the bases of attribution which has been prescribed in most legal systems so that, in Iran's legal system, Article 47 of the Islamic Penal Law and, in Egeypt, Articles 33 to 36 and 115 of the Penal Law are the basis for this.
Although the Iranian and Egyptian legal systems are similar in their acceptance of the plurality of the actus reus system and in the separation of plurality of the actus reus of crime from the plurality of the mensrea of a crime, they are differences in the procedure for retribution in the presumption of combined.
So, in this manner, Egyptian legislators unlike Iranian legislators accept the proportional combined punishment rule in the plurality of the actus reus of a crime. Thus, the legislator combines the issue of sentencing with the process of enforcement in many cases.

 
Keyword(s): PLURALITY OF ACTUS REUS OF A CRIME, PROPORTIONAL COMBINED PUNISHMENT RULE, ABSOLUTE COMBINED PUNISHMENT RULE
 
References: 
  • ندارد
 
  Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 62
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog