Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION   WINTER 2011 , Volume 10 , Number 4 (28); Page(s) 333 To 339.
 
Paper: 

COMPARISON OF SELF, PEER, AND CLINICAL TEACHER EVALUATION IN CLINICAL SKILLS EVALUATION PROCESS OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS

 
 
Author(s):  ATASH SOKHAN G.*, BOLBOL HAGHIGHI N., BAGHERI H., EBRAHIMI H.
 
* SCHOOL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY, SHAHROOD UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, HAFTE TIR SQUARE, SHAHROOD, IRAN
 
Abstract: 

Introduction: In order to have a precise judgment on performance, a variety of data resources are needed. In this regard, experts emphasize on employing different assessment groups for determining achievement of learning objectives by students. This study was performed to compare self, peer, and teacher evaluation in the process of midwifery students' clinical skills evaluation at delivery room of Fatemieh and Imam Hossein Hospitals affiliated to Shahrood University of Medical Sciences.
Methods: In this descriptive cross sectional study, 85 senior midwifery students were selected and evaluated by 3 methods of self, peer, and clinical teacher evaluation. Their clinical competencies were assessed using a researcher made questionnaire including two parts of general and specific skills evaluation. Data were analyzed by SPSS software using one-way analysis of variance and Tukey.
Results: The mean and standard deviation of the self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and clinical teacher’s evaluation of general clinical skills were 4.21
±0.46, 4.21±0.28, and 3.97±0.47, respectively. Considering specific clinical skills, the mean and standard deviation of self-evaluation, peer evaluation, and evaluation by clinical teachers were 3.91±0.54, 3.87±0.27, and 3.66±0.41, respectively. Analysis of variance revealed a significant difference among three methods of evaluation considering general and specific clinical skills.
Conclusion: With regard to scores dissimilarity in different assessment techniques, selfevaluation and peer evaluation could be considered as supplementary methods for other evaluation methods in the evaluation of students' clinical performance.

 
Keyword(s): SELF-EVALUATION, PEER EVALUATION, TEACHER EVALUATION, CLINICAL SKILLS, MIDWIFERY STUDENTS, DELIVERY ROOM
 
 
References: 
  • Not Registered.
  •  
  •  
 
Citations: 
 
+ Click to Cite.
APA: Copy

ATASH SOKHAN, G., & BOLBOL HAGHIGHI, N., & BAGHERI, H., & EBRAHIMI, H. (2011). COMPARISON OF SELF, PEER, AND CLINICAL TEACHER EVALUATION IN CLINICAL SKILLS EVALUATION PROCESS OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, 10(4 (28)), 333-339. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=191182



Vancouver: Copy

ATASH SOKHAN G., BOLBOL HAGHIGHI N., BAGHERI H., EBRAHIMI H.. COMPARISON OF SELF, PEER, AND CLINICAL TEACHER EVALUATION IN CLINICAL SKILLS EVALUATION PROCESS OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION. 2011 [cited 2021June22];10(4 (28)):333-339. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=191182



IEEE: Copy

ATASH SOKHAN, G., BOLBOL HAGHIGHI, N., BAGHERI, H., EBRAHIMI, H., 2011. COMPARISON OF SELF, PEER, AND CLINICAL TEACHER EVALUATION IN CLINICAL SKILLS EVALUATION PROCESS OF MIDWIFERY STUDENTS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL EDUCATION, [online] 10(4 (28)), pp.333-339. Available: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=191182.



 
 
Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 56
 
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog