Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   LITERARY CRITICISM   SPRING 2010 , Volume 3 , Number 9; Page(s) 73 To 89.
 
Paper: 

Pseudo-Postmodernism: A Critique Of Metafictional Techniques In Bivatan

 
 
Author(s):  Ghafari Sahar*
 
* TEHRAN UNIVERSITY
 
Abstract: 
The novelty in typography coupled with narrative techniques has turned Bivatan (Tehran, 2008) into a quasi-metafiction, i.e. a story which explores the process of its own construction. While in Bivatan the author is supposedly trying to produce a metafictional effect, a closer investigation into the novel will prove this claim void. In fact, Amirkhani’s novel fails to step into the realm of postmodernism.
Keyword(s): POSTMODERNISM, METAFICTION, AMIRKHANI, BIVATAN
 
 
 
References: 
  • Not Registered.
  •  
  •  
 
Citations: 
  • Not Registered.
 
+ Click to Cite.
APA: Copy

GHAFARI, S. (2010). PSEUDO-POSTMODERNISM: A CRITIQUE OF METAFICTIONAL TECHNIQUES IN BIVATAN. LITERARY CRITICISM, 3(9), 73-89. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=189044



Vancouver: Copy

GHAFARI SAHAR. PSEUDO-POSTMODERNISM: A CRITIQUE OF METAFICTIONAL TECHNIQUES IN BIVATAN. LITERARY CRITICISM. 2010 [cited 2022January17];3(9):73-89. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=189044



IEEE: Copy

GHAFARI, S., 2010. PSEUDO-POSTMODERNISM: A CRITIQUE OF METAFICTIONAL TECHNIQUES IN BIVATAN. LITERARY CRITICISM, [online] 3(9), pp.73-89. Available: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=189044.



 
 
Yearly Visit 49
 
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog