Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA   Winter 2002 , Volume 34 , Number 70; Page(s) 155 To 172.
 
Paper: 

AMBIGUITY IN PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE (A PARTICULIZER AFTER SEVERAL CONNECTEDSENTENCES)

 
 
Author(s):  QARAMALEKI M.
 
* 
 
Abstract: 
The present article surveys the antecedent of a particulizer after several connected sentences. Clarifying the issue and putting emphasis on its importance in the deduction of legal ordinances, this article argues for the possibility of considering the particulizer as refering to all previous sentences. The article studies the following views arguing for the theory: 1) Reference to the last, 2) Reference to all, 3) Literal community, 4) Distinction between unity and disunity of the sentences, 5)Distinction Mohaqqeq-e Naaini, 6) Theory of stopping comparing between two famous views; total reference is accepted finally.
 
Keyword(s): 
 
 
References: 
  • Not Registered.
  •  
 
+ Click to Cite.
APA: Copy

QARAMALEKI, M. (2002). AMBIGUITY IN PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE (A PARTICULIZER AFTER SEVERAL CONNECTEDSENTENCES). MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, 34(70), 155-172. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=13943



Vancouver: Copy

QARAMALEKI M.. AMBIGUITY IN PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE (A PARTICULIZER AFTER SEVERAL CONNECTEDSENTENCES). MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA. 2002 [cited 2021May18];34(70):155-172. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=13943



IEEE: Copy

QARAMALEKI, M., 2002. AMBIGUITY IN PRINCIPLES OF JURISPRUDENCE (A PARTICULIZER AFTER SEVERAL CONNECTEDSENTENCES). MAQALAT WA BARRASIHA, [online] 34(70), pp.155-172. Available: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=13943.



 
 
Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 38
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog