Paper Information

Journal:   IRANIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY   Fall 2004 , Volume 8 , Number 1; Page(s) 75 To 77.
 
Paper: 

HOW TO REPLY TO REFEREES" COMMENTS WHEN SUBMITTING MANUSCRIPTS FOR PUBLICATION

 
 
Author(s):  HYWEL C.W.
 
* 
 
Abstract: 
Background: The publication of articles in peer-reviewed scientific journals is a fairly complex and stepwise process that involves responding to referees" comments. Little guidence is available in the biomedical literature on how to deal with such comments.
Objective: The objective of this article is to provide guidance to notice writers on dealing with peer review comments in a way that maxImIzes the chance of subsequent acceptance.
Methods: This will be a literature review and review of the author"s experience as a writer and referee Results: Where possible, the author should consider revising and resubmitting rather than sending an article elsewhere. A structured layout for responding to referees" comments is suggested that includes the 3 golden rules: 1) respond completely; 2)respond politely; and 3)respond with evidence.
Conclusion: Responding to referees" comments requires the writer to overcome any feeling of personal attack, and to instead concentrate on addressing referees" concerns in a courteous, objective, and evidence based way. (J Am Acad Deramtol 2004; 51: 79-83).
 
Keyword(s): 
 
References: 
  • ندارد
 
  Yearly Visit 52
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog