Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   AYENEH MAREFAT   FALL-WINTER 2006-2007 , Volume - , Number 9; Page(s) 155 To 170.
 
Paper: 

A COMPARISON OF AL-FARABI AND ARISTOTLE'S IDEAS IN THEIR ARGANONS ABOUT FALLACIES

 
 
Author(s):  AREF R.*
 
* JAHAD DANESHGAHI SOCIAL AND HUMAN SCIENCE RESEARCH CENTER
 
Abstract: 

This article, studying Farabi's Idea about fallacies and comparing them with Aristotle's views, implicitly depicts the transformation and progress of logic made in the area of fallacy from Aristotle's time to Farabi's. First of all we put a discussion forward called "the definition of fallacy" then. We study the various approaches in fallacy studies.
Subsequently Aristotle and Farabi's Views about the definition of fallacy, approaches and target, are compared and contrasted. Finally the conclusions are drawn.

 
Keyword(s): FALLACY, FALLACY STUDY APPROACHES
 
 
References: 
  • Not Registered.
  •  
  •  
 
Citations: 
  • Not Registered.
 
+ Click to Cite.
APA: Copy

AREF, R. (2007). A COMPARISON OF AL-FARABI AND ARISTOTLE'S IDEAS IN THEIR ARGANONS ABOUT FALLACIES. AYENEH MAREFAT, -(9), 155-170. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=106473



Vancouver: Copy

AREF R.. A COMPARISON OF AL-FARABI AND ARISTOTLE'S IDEAS IN THEIR ARGANONS ABOUT FALLACIES. AYENEH MAREFAT. 2007 [cited 2021June20];-(9):155-170. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=106473



IEEE: Copy

AREF, R., 2007. A COMPARISON OF AL-FARABI AND ARISTOTLE'S IDEAS IN THEIR ARGANONS ABOUT FALLACIES. AYENEH MAREFAT, [online] -(9), pp.155-170. Available: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=106473.



 
 
Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 41
 
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog