Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES   OCTOBER-NOVEMBER 2007 , Volume 14 , Number 4; Page(s) 162 To 170.
 
Paper: 

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF BACTERIAL PROBIOTIC ON BROILERS PERFORMANCE AND SOME OF BLOOD FACTORS

 
 
Author(s):  ZARE SHAHNEH A.R.*, ABD ELAHI M.R., KAMYAB A.A.R., NIKKHAH A.
 
* DEPT. OF ANIMAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN, IRAN
 
Abstract: 

This experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design and included 600 Ross broiler chicks (male and female) which were divided into four groups with five replicates. This experiment was conducted in two periods starter 0-21, and grower 22-42, days. All of the diets were  isocaloric and isonitrogenous. The birds were received 0, 800, 1000 and 1200 gr probiotic (bacillus subtilis and bacillus licheniformis)/ ton diets in the starter period, and 0, 320, 400 and 480 g probiotic/ton diets in the grower period, which were termed groups 1 to 4, respectively. Body weight gain at starter period was significantly affected by dietary treatments (P<0.05), but body weight gain at grower period was not affected by using probiotic supplement (P>0.05). At the end of trial, the group 4 had maximum weight gain. The feed intake and mortality were not affected by experimental diets (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between treatments for feed efficiency (P>0.05), but there was significant difference between mean of treatments that were derived from Duncan,s multiple range test (P<0.05).There were no significant difference between groups in dressing, breast meat and thigh percent, at the end of experiment (P>0.05). The first treatment had the highest abdominal fat (3.04 percent) and fourth treatment group  had the lowest abdominal fat (2.43 percent), but among them, there was no significant difference (P>0.05). There was no significant difference between treatments for plasma cholesterol (P>0.05), but significant difference between mean of treatments were derived from Duncan,s multiple range test (P<0.05).The blood hemoglobin content was not affected by experimental diets (P>0.05). The number of white blood cells were significantly affected by dietary treatments (P<0.05), the group4 had maximum number of white blood cells, and group1 had minimum number of white blood cells.

 
Keyword(s): BROILERS, PROBIOTIC, BACILLUS SUBTILIS, BACILLUS LICHENIFORMIS
 
 
References: 
  • Not Registered.
  •  
  •  
 
Citations: 
  • Not Registered.
 
+ Click to Cite.
APA: Copy

ZARE SHAHNEH, A., & ABD ELAHI, M., & KAMYAB, A., & NIKKHAH, A. (2007). EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF BACTERIAL PROBIOTIC ON BROILERS PERFORMANCE AND SOME OF BLOOD FACTORS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES, 14(4), 162-170. https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=103659



Vancouver: Copy

ZARE SHAHNEH A.R., ABD ELAHI M.R., KAMYAB A.A.R., NIKKHAH A.. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF BACTERIAL PROBIOTIC ON BROILERS PERFORMANCE AND SOME OF BLOOD FACTORS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES. 2007 [cited 2021June14];14(4):162-170. Available from: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=103659



IEEE: Copy

ZARE SHAHNEH, A., ABD ELAHI, M., KAMYAB, A., NIKKHAH, A., 2007. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF BACTERIAL PROBIOTIC ON BROILERS PERFORMANCE AND SOME OF BLOOD FACTORS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES AND NATURAL RESOURCES, [online] 14(4), pp.162-170. Available: https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=103659.



 
 
Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 62
 
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog