Click for new scientific resources and news about Corona[COVID-19]

Paper Information

Journal:   JOURNAL OF HUMAN SCIENCES   Spring 2002 , Volume - , Number 33; Page(s) 385 To 398.
 
Paper: 

A CRITIQUE OF THE BOOK "AL-GHIAS AL-NAHVI" (DISPUTE OF AUTHOR OF THE BOOK "AL-GHIAS AL-NAHVI")

 
 
Author(s):  KHALIFEH SHOUSHTARI M.E.*
 
* Department of Arabic Languge and Literature Shahid Beheshti University
 
Abstract: 

The present article is a research about the faults of the book "Al-ghias Al-Nahvi". The main faults are listed as follows: First fault: The main title of the book is Al-ghias (analogy), however, neither it has been defined, nor its terminological meaning has been mentioned.
Second fault: The respectful author has not explained that how Abdollah Bin Abi Eshagh expanded analogy.
Third fault: The respectful author has cited a text from saybavih's book as an example for analogy while there is no analogy in this text.
Fourth fault: The respectful author has claimed that Saybavih had used the words "wrong" and "error" instead of the word "shaz"(scarce), while it is not so.
Fifth fault: The respectful author has claimed that Saybavih's analogy had two types, while this saying it is not accurate.

 
Keyword(s): ANALOGY, SYNTAX, ARABIC
 
References: 
  • ندارد
 
  Persian Abstract Yearly Visit 65
 
Latest on Blog
Enter SID Blog